Talk:Conventions: Difference between revisions
(Great Edits!) |
(Undo revision 142790 by 200.40.88.178 (Talk)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Just a thank you note [[User:Cjl]] and the two anonymous editors for making so many excellent fixes over the last day. I appreciate others cleaning up my bad grammar, unclear wording, and other bugaboos. Thank you! [[User:CharlesMerriam|CharlesMerriam]] 04:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT) |
Just a thank you note [[User:Cjl]] and the two anonymous editors for making so many excellent fixes over the last day. I appreciate others cleaning up my bad grammar, unclear wording, and other bugaboos. Thank you! [[User:CharlesMerriam|CharlesMerriam]] 04:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
== Procedural comment == |
|||
I'm thinking that in future it may be desirable for the proposals to go up on their own sub-pages (e.g. Conventions/Country box) instead of hosting them on the main Conventions page. Link to proposed convention goes somewhere prominent on main Conventions page. Point of this is that when proposal closes, and is pasted elsewhere, it more-or-less loses contrib history (which is still there on main, but intertwined with any other active proposals at the time, in otherwords, in a not very useful format). Also, the "elsewhere" element isn't well-defined, whereas a sub-page hierarchy of successful (and unsuccessful) proposals, is readily browseable/reviewable. Just a thought for consideration that comes up as work on implementation of two current proposals moves along towards the close phase. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 17:09, 2 May 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:30, 3 July 2008
Please use this page for discussions of the Conventions page. For discussions on active or accepted proposal, please make your comments on the Conventions page directly. CharlesMerriam 09:15, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
Great Edits!
Just a thank you note User:Cjl and the two anonymous editors for making so many excellent fixes over the last day. I appreciate others cleaning up my bad grammar, unclear wording, and other bugaboos. Thank you! CharlesMerriam 04:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
Procedural comment
I'm thinking that in future it may be desirable for the proposals to go up on their own sub-pages (e.g. Conventions/Country box) instead of hosting them on the main Conventions page. Link to proposed convention goes somewhere prominent on main Conventions page. Point of this is that when proposal closes, and is pasted elsewhere, it more-or-less loses contrib history (which is still there on main, but intertwined with any other active proposals at the time, in otherwords, in a not very useful format). Also, the "elsewhere" element isn't well-defined, whereas a sub-page hierarchy of successful (and unsuccessful) proposals, is readily browseable/reviewable. Just a thought for consideration that comes up as work on implementation of two current proposals moves along towards the close phase. Cjl 17:09, 2 May 2008 (EDT)