User:Sj/Log/Reviews: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Walter's rectum 22/Log/Reviews moved to User:Sj/Log/Reviews over redirect: revert) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Getting people to review what they regularly think about is hard; but once they start, its addictive. But how to get people to work together to review things they jointly care about? Is an elaborate trust system necessary? A social network? |
Getting people to review what they regularly think about is hard; but once they start, its addictive. But how to get people to work together to review things they jointly care about? Is an elaborate trust system necessary? A social network? As people start to review content submitted for inclusion on the laptops, we are using a combination of existing reviews, categorization, and new mechanisms for review and classification. How can we make the new mechanisms effective and inclusive? Comments welcome. |
||
Latest revision as of 15:43, 20 December 2009
Getting people to review what they regularly think about is hard; but once they start, its addictive. But how to get people to work together to review things they jointly care about? Is an elaborate trust system necessary? A social network? As people start to review content submitted for inclusion on the laptops, we are using a combination of existing reviews, categorization, and new mechanisms for review and classification. How can we make the new mechanisms effective and inclusive? Comments welcome.