Journalism Jam New York/Results: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(results)
 
(report)
Line 1: Line 1:
Sunday afternoon wrapped up our Journalism Jam in New York, and I know
Sunday afternoon wrapped up our Journalism Jam in New York, and I know
many of you were at Columbia at some point this weekend to see the Content
many of you were at Columbia at some point this weekend to see the Content
Jam as it happened. But for those who weren't, here were a couple of
Jam as it happened. But for those who weren't, here were a couple of
Line 11: Line 11:
- And of course, dozens and dozens of hours putting the software together
- And of course, dozens and dozens of hours putting the software together


== Report activity ==
The output of the weekend is this software: [[Report]] [http://hcs.harvard.edu/~sjklein/Report.tar].
The output of the weekend is this software: [[Report]] [http://hcs.harvard.edu/~sjklein/Report.tar].


Line 27: Line 28:
posts to http://olpcjam.wordpress.com
posts to http://olpcjam.wordpress.com


== Guide ==
Now, originally we wanted the software to include guides for young students
Now, originally we wanted the software to include guides for young students
on the basics of journalism, and our two journalists, Katie Reedy and
on the basics of journalism, and our two journalists, Katie Reedy and
Emmannuelle Collette wrote up this helpful guide: '''[[Report#Guide]]'''
Emmannuelle Collette wrote up this helpful guide: '''[[Report#Guide]]'''


== UI ideas ==
Dan Sutera has made some mock-ups of how a UI could integrate this content
with the existing software (attached below).


So as you can see, a lot came out of the weekend, and it seems like everyone
had a good time. Good enough in fact, that I know several people want to
continue to be involved and make sure this project really develops. Rajesh
said that he might be able to set up an independent study with some teachers
to entice students to work on this for credit. I hope he will talk further
with SJ about that as the next semester approaches. In general, we want to
make sure that this Jam is only the beginning of a larger effort to bring
journalism software to the XO's.

Briefly I need to thank those people who lost some significant sleep (and
fell behind in a few problem sets) for this project. Rajesh Ramakrishnan,
Nick Bergson-Shilcock, Dan Lee, John Galligher, Boris Mitzak, and Tristan
Naumann all contributed really significant time to making the software end
of this happen. Emmannuelle Collette and Katie Reedy were very patient in
explaining what actually belongs in a newspaper article (it was news to me,
if you can pardon the figure of speech), and put in a long Saturday on this
that could've been spent preparing for Ahmadinejad's visit. And Dan Sutera
and Anna Starikov were very clear-headed organizers, asking things like
'what will this software actually do' - stuff that just didn't occur to me I
guess. I hope they're all put on a short-list for free laptops.

I think the leaders for this project will have to identify themselves as
this develops. Rajesh will look into independent study, and we'll all sort
of look at our schedules in the coming weeks. But thanks once again - this
was a lot of fun, and I hope it got more people interested in the project.

--Brendan Ballou

Revision as of 14:45, 25 September 2007

Sunday afternoon wrapped up our Journalism Jam in New York, and I know many of you were at Columbia at some point this weekend to see the Content Jam as it happened. But for those who weren't, here were a couple of highlights:

- Law Professor Eben Moglen speaking on the power of open source software
- ICANN board member Susan Crawford talking about network neutrality
- A dozen local high school students testing our software and offering

feedback (pictures attached)

- Coverage in all the campus media
- And of course, dozens and dozens of hours putting the software together

Report activity

The output of the weekend is this software: Report [1].

Right now, Report allows students to write newspaper articles, insert photos, and load them to a blog. Rajesh provided a few technical notes:

- This works for build 595
- The wordpress module is provided in the ./wordpress directory and needs to

be setup through ./wordpress/setup.py install

- The install script works as per expectation: ./setup.py dev
- The blog feature works to some extent, but it currently only grabs the

text [The AbiWord module needs to be modified to somehow spit out data in a better format]

- No implementation work has been done on the plan tab.
- The username and password to the blog have been hardcoded.  It currently

posts to http://olpcjam.wordpress.com

Guide

Now, originally we wanted the software to include guides for young students on the basics of journalism, and our two journalists, Katie Reedy and Emmannuelle Collette wrote up this helpful guide: Report#Guide


UI ideas

Dan Sutera has made some mock-ups of how a UI could integrate this content with the existing software (attached below).


So as you can see, a lot came out of the weekend, and it seems like everyone had a good time. Good enough in fact, that I know several people want to continue to be involved and make sure this project really develops. Rajesh said that he might be able to set up an independent study with some teachers to entice students to work on this for credit. I hope he will talk further with SJ about that as the next semester approaches. In general, we want to make sure that this Jam is only the beginning of a larger effort to bring journalism software to the XO's.

Briefly I need to thank those people who lost some significant sleep (and fell behind in a few problem sets) for this project. Rajesh Ramakrishnan, Nick Bergson-Shilcock, Dan Lee, John Galligher, Boris Mitzak, and Tristan Naumann all contributed really significant time to making the software end of this happen. Emmannuelle Collette and Katie Reedy were very patient in explaining what actually belongs in a newspaper article (it was news to me, if you can pardon the figure of speech), and put in a long Saturday on this that could've been spent preparing for Ahmadinejad's visit. And Dan Sutera and Anna Starikov were very clear-headed organizers, asking things like 'what will this software actually do' - stuff that just didn't occur to me I guess. I hope they're all put on a short-list for free laptops.

I think the leaders for this project will have to identify themselves as this develops. Rajesh will look into independent study, and we'll all sort of look at our schedules in the coming weeks. But thanks once again - this was a lot of fun, and I hope it got more people interested in the project.

--Brendan Ballou