OLPC talk:Style guide: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(no subpages...? buaaa!)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== subpages ==
== subpages ==


Yes, I agree, subpages are '''ugly''', and I feel guilty about their volume in the wiki. I have been thinking about the whole ''[[translating]] framework''... especially regarding the new 'language features' that the wiki upgrade has provided—although I haven't documented myself...
Yes, I agree, subpages are '''ugly''', and I feel guilty about their volume in the wiki. I have been thinking about the whole ''[[translating]] framework''... especially regarding the new 'language features' that the wiki upgrade has provided—although I haven't documented myself...

Revision as of 00:39, 10 January 2008

subpages

Yes, I agree, subpages are ugly, and I feel guilty about their volume in the wiki. I have been thinking about the whole translating framework... especially regarding the new 'language features' that the wiki upgrade has provided—although I haven't documented myself...

Nevertheless, I do think that there are situations where pages seem to 'cluster' around some root page. For example, in Kuku you have the Kuku/Localization page, which seems rather natural and logical (the alternative of say [[Kuku localization]] although perfectly valid, I feel it much more 'disconnected' from the 'root'.

Another thing is the [[blahblah/translations]]... or the {{Country info}}... or whatever other use (btw, let's not forget about the HIG).

I'm all for simplifying things... :) --Xavi 02:47, 11 July 2007 (EDT)