OLPC:Featured content: Difference between revisions
m (OLPC:Brilliant pages moved to OLPC:Featured content: deep link) |
m (Category:Content) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{peer-review-nav}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
This page lists '''featured content''' associated with OLPC in some fashion, content that deserves special recognition and attention as a model for others. Content not ready to be featured may need to go through explicit [[OLPC:peer review]] first. Activity authors and contributors should look at the [[OLPC:guidelines]] for activity development. |
|||
= Featured projects = |
|||
OLPC is part of many unusual projects and collaborations, some of them deserving of wider recognition. If you uare working on a project you think has done some amazing things with XOs or their communities, nominate the project here, with a link to its works and an indication of its scope and contributors. |
|||
== Nominations == |
|||
=== Our Stories === |
|||
A corner of Google with 40 volunteers, and UNICEF with a dozen active country teams. Working away on a gen 2 version of [http://ourstories.org the alpha site], but already open for business in 8 countries. |
|||
=== GCompris === |
|||
Bruno C. has done a lot of great work on this largely himself; with only occasional support and testing from others. Since his release, this has gotten much more interest; not a specific bundle of greatness, but a good project to consider and a role model for how to mass-sugarize a set of similar programs. |
|||
= Featured bundles = |
|||
Please nominate activities and content collections you find inspiring or excellent. |
|||
== Nominations == |
|||
=== Biology === |
|||
The Wilson [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Biology_%28collection%29 biology collection] sets a high bar for what an 'overview' bundle should be. --[[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] |
|||
= Brilliant pages = |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== Nominations == |
== Nominations == |
||
| Line 11: | Line 36: | ||
{{stub}} |
{{stub}} |
||
[[Category:Content]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 02:31, 21 August 2008
This page lists featured content associated with OLPC in some fashion, content that deserves special recognition and attention as a model for others. Content not ready to be featured may need to go through explicit OLPC:peer review first. Activity authors and contributors should look at the OLPC:guidelines for activity development.
Featured projects
OLPC is part of many unusual projects and collaborations, some of them deserving of wider recognition. If you uare working on a project you think has done some amazing things with XOs or their communities, nominate the project here, with a link to its works and an indication of its scope and contributors.
Nominations
Our Stories
A corner of Google with 40 volunteers, and UNICEF with a dozen active country teams. Working away on a gen 2 version of the alpha site, but already open for business in 8 countries.
GCompris
Bruno C. has done a lot of great work on this largely himself; with only occasional support and testing from others. Since his release, this has gotten much more interest; not a specific bundle of greatness, but a good project to consider and a role model for how to mass-sugarize a set of similar programs.
Featured bundles
Please nominate activities and content collections you find inspiring or excellent.
Nominations
Biology
The Wilson biology collection sets a high bar for what an 'overview' bundle should be. --Sj talk
Brilliant pages
Pages on the wiki that contain brilliant writing, documentation, templates, or other work. See also OLPC:peer review for content that has been nominated for peer review. Currently a section of the larger featured content page.
Nominations
- Taste the Rainbow - mstone is shy about this, but it's already quite good. Maybe not brilliant yet, but worth a discussion.
- Build system - nominated recently on IRC
- Educators - perhaps poorly named, but contains some excellent nuggets of information
- ..
Brilliant pages
none have been accepted yet. for a discussion of the nom and approval process, see talk.