Category talk:Release Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(posting question about cat versus template.) |
(comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I created Category:Release_notes (thinking it was the preferred capitalization style) before realizing this page is being generated by the Template:Release_Notes usage. Any opinions on which is preferred wiki style? I added Template:Release_Notes to some pages, but I'd rather not continue without some feedback on this style question. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 00:20, 26 March 2008 (EDT) |
I created Category:Release_notes (thinking it was the preferred capitalization style) before realizing this page is being generated by the Template:Release_Notes usage. Any opinions on which is preferred wiki style? I added Template:Release_Notes to some pages, but I'd rather not continue without some feedback on this style question. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 00:20, 26 March 2008 (EDT) |
||
: The [[style guide]] is definitive that "Release notes" is the preferred capitalization, but people don't follow it. I fixed [[Template:Release Notes]] to use lowercase (even though its own name is wrong <tt>;-)</tt>), so nothing should be in this category, so now this page can and should be deleted. -- [[User:Skierpage|Skierpage]] 00:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:28, 26 July 2008
I created Category:Release_notes (thinking it was the preferred capitalization style) before realizing this page is being generated by the Template:Release_Notes usage. Any opinions on which is preferred wiki style? I added Template:Release_Notes to some pages, but I'd rather not continue without some feedback on this style question. Cjl 00:20, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
- The style guide is definitive that "Release notes" is the preferred capitalization, but people don't follow it. I fixed Template:Release Notes to use lowercase (even though its own name is wrong ;-)), so nothing should be in this category, so now this page can and should be deleted. -- Skierpage 00:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)