Talk:XO Accessibility: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(comment) |
(Commercial vendors) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Terms that are specific enough to be useful (e.g. hearing-impaired, deaf, low-vison, blind) can differentiate between "low bandwidth" and "no bandwith" sensory input. The "no bandwidth" terms are unfortunately somewhat emotionally-loaded from historic mis-application, but they are short and accurate, if applied properly. As for motor dysfunction, it is somewhat harder to specify and unfortunately further muddied by misappropriation of meaningful clinical terms (e.g. spastic) by popular misuse as pejorative terms. My suggestion is to try to be specific and the terminology tends to come across as less judgmental. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 01:17, 28 May 2008 (EDT) |
:Terms that are specific enough to be useful (e.g. hearing-impaired, deaf, low-vison, blind) can differentiate between "low bandwidth" and "no bandwith" sensory input. The "no bandwidth" terms are unfortunately somewhat emotionally-loaded from historic mis-application, but they are short and accurate, if applied properly. As for motor dysfunction, it is somewhat harder to specify and unfortunately further muddied by misappropriation of meaningful clinical terms (e.g. spastic) by popular misuse as pejorative terms. My suggestion is to try to be specific and the terminology tends to come across as less judgmental. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 01:17, 28 May 2008 (EDT) |
||
== You might want to check out this community of educators == |
|||
http://www.classroom20.com/group/technologyinspecialeducation |
|||
This group is intended for teachers who adapt their curriculum to accommodate the needs of special education students with the assistance of technology. |
|||
== Commercial vendors == |
|||
Looking at commercial vendors of accessibility products (and then finding a way to do it cheaper) is a reasonable starting point. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 14:53, 13 June 2008 (EDT) |
|||
*http://www.nanopac.com/Default.htm |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:53, 13 June 2008
Regarding the word "disabled"
As a "disabled person" myself, I'm not thrilled about the use of the terms "disability," "handicap," "differently abled," "conditions," and so forth - but I can't think of better short words to express the same concept concisely. Ideas for this are very much welcome. Mchua 23:04, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
- The term "disabled" may certainly be offensive, but worse than that, it is simply too vague to be useful. You may have low audio bandwidth (hearing-impaired), but anyone that thinks you are disabled hasn't tried to keep up with your wiki edits :-)
- Terms that are specific enough to be useful (e.g. hearing-impaired, deaf, low-vison, blind) can differentiate between "low bandwidth" and "no bandwith" sensory input. The "no bandwidth" terms are unfortunately somewhat emotionally-loaded from historic mis-application, but they are short and accurate, if applied properly. As for motor dysfunction, it is somewhat harder to specify and unfortunately further muddied by misappropriation of meaningful clinical terms (e.g. spastic) by popular misuse as pejorative terms. My suggestion is to try to be specific and the terminology tends to come across as less judgmental. Cjl 01:17, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
You might want to check out this community of educators
http://www.classroom20.com/group/technologyinspecialeducation
This group is intended for teachers who adapt their curriculum to accommodate the needs of special education students with the assistance of technology.
Commercial vendors
Looking at commercial vendors of accessibility products (and then finding a way to do it cheaper) is a reasonable starting point. Cjl 14:53, 13 June 2008 (EDT)