Talk:Trac: Difference between revisions
(trac wiki clean-up) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# [[:Template:Ticket]] |
# [[:Template:Ticket]] |
||
In addition, see [[: |
In addition, see [[:Trac wiki bookmarks]] , [[:Category:Trac references]] |
||
Disambiguate [[ |
Disambiguate [[Activities trac]] |
||
[[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 22:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 22:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Trac enhancement suggestions == |
|||
Starting a list of things I'd like to see on our Trac system, since I've been using it heavily for testing the last 2 weeks - others please feel free to add. Some are technical (plugins, etc) some are procedural (adding tags, reports, etc) and some are usage based, and some... are just suggestions. |
|||
* Adding another next-action to the workflow: "write test case" |
|||
* Requiring all tickets to have test cases at the end of the ticket body, so it's easy to reproduce a bug and verify it as closed, and we don't have to hunt for test cases in the comments |
|||
* Make tickets and comments editable by the original authors + admins (important if the test case in the ticket body is canonical - sometimes it'll have to be edited) |
|||
* [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TracBacks TracBacks plugin] - leaves a comment on a ticket when it's been referred to by another ticket (disclosure: I wrote this, so I'm biased, but we found it very useful at TOPP) |
|||
There's also been a Trac split proposed for upstream/downstream sugar streams (sugar-core and sugar-olpc) by Sugar Labs; if this happens I'd like to suggest implementing inter-Trac-instance TracBacks. |
|||
[[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 18:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:46, 25 September 2010
Trac wiki clean-up
There are currently several ways to link to Trac tickets on-wiki, perhaps this could/should be simplified a little bit.
- <trac>1</trac>
- Template:Trac
- Template:Ticket
In addition, see Trac wiki bookmarks , Category:Trac references
Disambiguate Activities trac
Cjl 22:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Trac enhancement suggestions
Starting a list of things I'd like to see on our Trac system, since I've been using it heavily for testing the last 2 weeks - others please feel free to add. Some are technical (plugins, etc) some are procedural (adding tags, reports, etc) and some are usage based, and some... are just suggestions.
- Adding another next-action to the workflow: "write test case"
- Requiring all tickets to have test cases at the end of the ticket body, so it's easy to reproduce a bug and verify it as closed, and we don't have to hunt for test cases in the comments
- Make tickets and comments editable by the original authors + admins (important if the test case in the ticket body is canonical - sometimes it'll have to be edited)
- TracBacks plugin - leaves a comment on a ticket when it's been referred to by another ticket (disclosure: I wrote this, so I'm biased, but we found it very useful at TOPP)
There's also been a Trac split proposed for upstream/downstream sugar streams (sugar-core and sugar-olpc) by Sugar Labs; if this happens I'd like to suggest implementing inter-Trac-instance TracBacks. Mchua 18:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)