Talk:Deployment Guide/Glossary: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
This is not exactly as I would like it to appear. It would be nice to -noinclude- the templates and TOC from Glossary, but I'm not exactly sure how to arrange that. If someone with more wiki transclusion experience could make some edits, this might just work out. It's less than pretty as it is right now. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 19:08, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
This is not exactly as I would like it to appear. It would be nice to -noinclude- the templates and TOC from Glossary, but I'm not exactly sure how to arrange that. If someone with more wiki transclusion experience could make some edits, this might just work out. It's less than pretty as it is right now. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 19:08, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

:I did some testing and I think I have it. By bracketing the body of [[Glossary]] with <nowiki><onlyinclude> and </onlyinclude>,</nowiki> just inside the template assignments, the desired effect is achieved, without any impact on Glossary. I'm going to be bold and make these edits as there is agreement on principle, see [[Talk:Deployment_Guide]] [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 22:23, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 02:23, 1 April 2008

This is not exactly as I would like it to appear. It would be nice to -noinclude- the templates and TOC from Glossary, but I'm not exactly sure how to arrange that. If someone with more wiki transclusion experience could make some edits, this might just work out. It's less than pretty as it is right now. Cjl 19:08, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

I did some testing and I think I have it. By bracketing the body of Glossary with <onlyinclude> and </onlyinclude>, just inside the template assignments, the desired effect is achieved, without any impact on Glossary. I'm going to be bold and make these edits as there is agreement on principle, see Talk:Deployment_Guide Cjl 22:23, 31 March 2008 (EDT)