Learning Learning/Parable 2/Insight: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(chicnamo) |
m (Reverted edits by 122.138.14.237 (Talk); changed back to last version by Sj) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
elleto |
|||
Insight: |
Insight: |
||
The logic of the Foobar story depends on accepting the analogy between |
The logic of the Foobar story depends on accepting the analogy between “computers” and “writing.” This is an important insight that was not at all obvious in the early days of the computer presence and is still not obvious to everyone. Thinkers who have influenced my thinking about this are Alan Kay, Paulo Freire, Andrea diSessa and most recently James Paul Gee. (Google them.) |
||
(Last sentence has been corrected: Perhaps by Freudian slip, I originally wrote "John Paul Gee" ....) |
(Last sentence has been corrected: Perhaps by Freudian slip, I originally wrote "John Paul Gee" ....) |
||
Revision as of 16:08, 12 July 2008
Insight:
The logic of the Foobar story depends on accepting the analogy between “computers” and “writing.” This is an important insight that was not at all obvious in the early days of the computer presence and is still not obvious to everyone. Thinkers who have influenced my thinking about this are Alan Kay, Paulo Freire, Andrea diSessa and most recently James Paul Gee. (Google them.)
(Last sentence has been corrected: Perhaps by Freudian slip, I originally wrote "John Paul Gee" ....)