Talk:Keyboard layouts: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Colemak Keyboard: Invite diagram.) |
(Keyboard page naming convention proposal) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I moved this from the article to here. It has nothing to do with the topic of the page, which is existing layouts in Linux. If you want to put up a keyboard diagram, go ahead.--[[User:Mokurai|Mokurai]] 09:27, 23 November 2007 (EST) |
:I moved this from the article to here. It has nothing to do with the topic of the page, which is existing layouts in Linux. If you want to put up a keyboard diagram, go ahead.--[[User:Mokurai|Mokurai]] 09:27, 23 November 2007 (EST) |
||
== Keyboard page naming convention proposal == |
|||
A proposal hoping to develop a consensus on a clearer naming/tagging convention for keyboard layout pages has been posted [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Conventions#Keyboard_Layouts_page_naming.2Ftagging_proposal here]. Comments, copy-editing and in particular some certainly needed improvements/clarifications would be welcome. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 03:30, 11 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 07:30, 11 April 2008
Main page character encoding
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --Keybounce 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- I see <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> in the page source. Please check your fonts and font settings.--Mokurai 09:28, 23 November 2007 (EST)
Colemak Keyboard
Dvorak has too many issues to be a mainstream alternative to QWERTY. These problems are explained on the Colemak FAQ. --Jj05 13:17, 19 December 2006 (EST)
- I moved this from the article to here. It has nothing to do with the topic of the page, which is existing layouts in Linux. If you want to put up a keyboard diagram, go ahead.--Mokurai 09:27, 23 November 2007 (EST)
Keyboard page naming convention proposal
A proposal hoping to develop a consensus on a clearer naming/tagging convention for keyboard layout pages has been posted here. Comments, copy-editing and in particular some certainly needed improvements/clarifications would be welcome. Cjl 03:30, 11 April 2008 (EDT)