OLPC Europe/Consensus Finding: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (+ presentation link)
(added catgeory)
Line 15: Line 15:
* Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus Rough consensus]
* Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus Rough consensus]
* Presentation of voting systems and their weaknesses: [http://www.olpcaustria.org/downloads/other/voting_aaron.pdf Voting_aaron.pdf] (Aaron Kaplan)
* Presentation of voting systems and their weaknesses: [http://www.olpcaustria.org/downloads/other/voting_aaron.pdf Voting_aaron.pdf] (Aaron Kaplan)

[[Category:Europe]]

Revision as of 16:51, 11 January 2008

Draft

Consensus finding

After initial thinking about a basic set of guidelines and visions, on our first IRC Meeting we basically agreed on:


Decision Finding

Working groups make decisions through a "rough consensus" process. This consensus does not require that all participants agree although this is, of course, preferred. In general, the dominant view of the working group shall prevail. (However, it must be noted that "dominance" is not to be determined on the basis of volume or persistence, but rather a more general sense of agreement). Consensus can be determined by text messages, a showing of hands, or any other means on which the community agrees (by rough consensus, of course). Note that 51% of the working group does not qualify as "rough consensus" and 99% is better than rough. At OLPC Europe, if at a voting the majority agrees, and the minority disagrees, the consensus has been reached if at least 70% voted for it.


References