Community testing meetings/2008-11-13: Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
See [[Community testing meetings/2008-11-06]] |
See [[Community testing meetings/2008-11-06]] |
||
Exciting updates since: |
|||
* Gary got in contact with [[Sugarbot]]'s developer, Zach! |
|||
* Great thoughts from Greg re: Activity ownership and upstream |
|||
* Anna from the Birmingham deployment edited [[Talk:Dsh]] with XS setup instructions |
|||
== G1G1: What can we do to help? == |
== G1G1: What can we do to help? == |
||
Revision as of 21:59, 13 November 2008
This is a Community testing meeting. Location is in #olpc-meeting on Start date::November 13, 2008 22:00 (time is in UTC, click here to find the meeting time for your time zone.)
Please add suggestions for agenda items you'd like covered!
Previous meeting's action items
See Community testing meetings/2008-11-06
Exciting updates since:
- Gary got in contact with Sugarbot's developer, Zach!
- Great thoughts from Greg re: Activity ownership and upstream
- Anna from the Birmingham deployment edited Talk:Dsh with XS setup instructions
G1G1: What can we do to help?
- Caryl's Test Jam idea
Activity testing instructions
Feedback on How to test an Activity? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain?
Excellent point brought up by Caryl and Greg via email: We are building a community of testers who are dedicated to keeping their individual Activities well-tested and properly functioning, and one part of this is making sure that the documentation matches with the product under test, and that they're both ridiculously good. ("High-quality" might be the, ah, more proper term.) The product under test includes documentation.
Test result reporting instructions
Feedback on Reporting test results? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain?
Activity testing automation
See Activity testing automation
Mission/scope/focus of Community testing
What are our goals? See Community Testing#Introduction for the current strawman. After we agree on goals, we can figure out how to measure whether we're meeting them. We're already working towards these goals (or a very similar set), and should continue to - it's just sometimes useful to state these things explicitly.
Action items
- mchua to talk with sj, kimquirk, and others about what kinds of brib^H^H^H^H resources we can offer to motivate and reward testers, both tangible and intangible. (Deferred from last week on account of SJ and Kim's G1G1 workload.)