OLPC:Administrators: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== Requests for adminship ==
== Requests for adminship ==
=== [[User:Firefoxman|Firefoxman]] ===
=== [[User:Firefoxman|Firefoxman]] ===
Working with Michael Connet. He requested adminship by mail. I'd like to see a bit more non-admin cleanup first... [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 19:06, 8 December 2007 (EST)
Working with Michael Connet. He requested adminship by mail.

==== Comments ====
* '''Neutral''': I'd like to see a bit more non-admin cleanup first... [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 19:06, 8 December 2007 (EST)

=== [[User:Mcfletch|Mcfletch]] ===
Working with communities online. Helpful on the wiki; might make a fine admin. [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 21:32, 17 December 2007 (EST)

==== comments ====
* '''Support''' as nominator. [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 21:32, 17 December 2007 (EST)


== Questions ==
== Questions ==

Revision as of 02:32, 18 December 2007

This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. Some notes for administrators.

Requests for adminship

Firefoxman

Working with Michael Connet. He requested adminship by mail.

Comments

  • Neutral: I'd like to see a bit more non-admin cleanup first... Sj talk 19:06, 8 December 2007 (EST)

Mcfletch

Working with communities online. Helpful on the wiki; might make a fine admin. Sj talk 21:32, 17 December 2007 (EST)

comments

  • Support as nominator. Sj talk 21:32, 17 December 2007 (EST)

Questions

  • I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
    Yes, it helps.
  • I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
    Ahh, interesting point. We should do this.
  • I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
    No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
  • FYI: People are still posting general questions on the Talk:The_OLPC_Wiki page, even though it is supposed to redirect to Talk:Main Page (which makes it something of a black hole for questions). Is it possible to disable editing on that discussion page (or merge the two)? —Joe 11:51, 7 September 2007 (EDT)

Where are our readers from?

Some time ago (technically last year ;) I raised the question about who's reading what - and more importantly (for me) from where. (See here).

My question originates in that knowing that kind of information we may be able either to tune content or promote/demote links in the front page, faq, etc. For example, if I knew that it was argies rarely visit Argentina's page, it could mean that they are looking for other kind of news, data, whatever; but at least I'd know they aren't reading it - maybe it's just lack of local diffusion.--Xavi 20:49, 20 January 2007 (EST)

Current bureaucrats

see also: Special:Listusers

  • Cjb ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Felice ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Jg ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Krstic ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Mako ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Sj ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Walter ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
  • Wmb@firmworks.com ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)

Current sysops