OLPC talk:Style guide: Difference between revisions
(no subpages...? buaaa!) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== subpages == |
== subpages == |
||
Yes, I agree, subpages are '''ugly''', and I feel guilty about their volume in the wiki. I have been thinking about the whole ''[[translating]] framework''... especially regarding the new 'language features' that the wiki upgrade has provided—although I haven't documented myself... |
Yes, I agree, subpages are '''ugly''', and I feel guilty about their volume in the wiki. I have been thinking about the whole ''[[translating]] framework''... especially regarding the new 'language features' that the wiki upgrade has provided—although I haven't documented myself... |
||
Revision as of 00:39, 10 January 2008
subpages
Yes, I agree, subpages are ugly, and I feel guilty about their volume in the wiki. I have been thinking about the whole translating framework... especially regarding the new 'language features' that the wiki upgrade has provided—although I haven't documented myself...
Nevertheless, I do think that there are situations where pages seem to 'cluster' around some root page. For example, in Kuku you have the Kuku/Localization page, which seems rather natural and logical (the alternative of say [[Kuku localization]] although perfectly valid, I feel it much more 'disconnected' from the 'root'.
Another thing is the [[blahblah/translations]]... or the {{Country info}}... or whatever other use (btw, let's not forget about the HIG).
I'm all for simplifying things... :) --Xavi 02:47, 11 July 2007 (EDT)