OLPC talk:Support gang: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→I prefer IRC) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== I prefer IRC === |
=== I prefer IRC === |
||
* [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] (vote is for a private chat). I'm hearing-impaired and can't understand conference calls, period. Also, IRC has the benefit of automatic logs for ease of meeting-noteness. |
* [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] (vote is for a private chat). I'm hearing-impaired and can't understand conference calls, period. Also, IRC has the benefit of automatic logs for ease of meeting-noteness. I will personally volunteer to clean-up and post (to teamwiki and the SG mailing list) IRC meeting notes. |
||
* [[User:Sethwoodworth|Seth]] The sound quality on the phone system is awful. Phone meetings are fine for non technical people, or for groups up to 10 or 12, but 20+ is far too much. IRC is logged, much faster, generally preferable to me. |
* [[User:Sethwoodworth|Seth]] The sound quality on the phone system is awful. Phone meetings are fine for non technical people, or for groups up to 10 or 12, but 20+ is far too much. IRC is logged, much faster, generally preferable to me. |
||
Revision as of 21:11, 4 May 2008
Meeting format
I'm just curious about this - not a binding vote or anything... but what format would people like to have support-gang weekly meetings in?
I prefer Phone
I prefer IRC
- Mchua (vote is for a private chat). I'm hearing-impaired and can't understand conference calls, period. Also, IRC has the benefit of automatic logs for ease of meeting-noteness. I will personally volunteer to clean-up and post (to teamwiki and the SG mailing list) IRC meeting notes.
- Seth The sound quality on the phone system is awful. Phone meetings are fine for non technical people, or for groups up to 10 or 12, but 20+ is far too much. IRC is logged, much faster, generally preferable to me.