Community testing meetings/2008-11-13: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Activity testing instructions == |
== Activity testing instructions == |
||
=== Pre-meeting === |
|||
Feedback on [[How to test an Activity]]? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain? |
Feedback on [[How to test an Activity]]? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain? |
||
Excellent point brought up by Caryl and Greg via email: We are building a community of testers who are dedicated to keeping their individual Activities well-tested and properly functioning, ''and'' one part of this is making sure that the documentation matches with the product under test, and that they're both ''ridiculously'' good. ("High-quality" might be the, ah, more proper term.) The product under test ''includes'' documentation. |
Excellent point brought up by Caryl and Greg via email: We are building a community of testers who are dedicated to keeping their individual Activities well-tested and properly functioning, ''and'' one part of this is making sure that the documentation matches with the product under test, and that they're both ''ridiculously'' good. ("High-quality" might be the, ah, more proper term.) The product under test ''includes'' documentation. |
||
=== During meeting === |
|||
* Tabitha and Alastair from the NZ Wellington OLPC community test group introduced themselves and their work - they have great procedures, months of experience testing Activities and are going to lead the charge in putting up oracles and reaching out to Activity developers. Their group meets again tomorrow. A warm welcome to all our NZ testers - and thank you to Martin for the introduction! |
|||
* Agreed to continue work on [[How to test an Activity]] - moving forward, things look good so far |
|||
== Test result reporting instructions == |
== Test result reporting instructions == |
||
=== Pre-meeting === |
|||
Feedback on [[Reporting test results]]? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain? |
Feedback on [[Reporting test results]]? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain? |
||
=== During meeting === |
|||
* Merged with [[#Activity testing instructions]] in discussion |
|||
* We need to make new forms for our G1G1 testing goal |
|||
== Activity testing automation == |
== Activity testing automation == |
Revision as of 06:35, 14 November 2008
This is a Community testing meeting. This meeting is over. Location is in #olpc-meeting on Start date::November 13, 2008 22:00 (time is in UTC, click here to find the meeting time for your time zone.)
Meeting logs are here.
Previous meeting's action items
See Community testing meetings/2008-11-06#Action items - all done!
Exciting updates since:
- Gary got in contact with Sugarbot's developer, Zach!
- Great thoughts from Greg re: Activity ownership and upstream
- Anna from the Birmingham deployment edited Talk:Dsh with XS setup instructions
G1G1: What can we do to help?
Pre-meeting
- Caryl's Test Jam idea
During meeting
- Our first short-term goal (proposed thanks to Caryl): All G1G1-2008 Activities tested by Dec. 25, 2008. Definition of "tested" well on its way to being solid - this time next week we should have *metrics!* and be posting *how completed* we are! Oh boy! (Hey, I'm an engineer. I get excited about measuring stuff. :) These are listed on http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1; there are 28 in total. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Community_testing for our current measurements of progress (as of this email writing, it's a simple list. This will change rapidly.)
- Longer-term plan: this will enable us to stress-test a good community testing participation framework so that we can recruit Lots Of New Volunteers (G1G1 donors?) starting in January - "please help!" pages are only useful inasmuch as there are people, groups, and tasks standing by to welcome newcomers and help them get started.
Activity testing instructions
Pre-meeting
Feedback on How to test an Activity? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain?
Excellent point brought up by Caryl and Greg via email: We are building a community of testers who are dedicated to keeping their individual Activities well-tested and properly functioning, and one part of this is making sure that the documentation matches with the product under test, and that they're both ridiculously good. ("High-quality" might be the, ah, more proper term.) The product under test includes documentation.
During meeting
- Tabitha and Alastair from the NZ Wellington OLPC community test group introduced themselves and their work - they have great procedures, months of experience testing Activities and are going to lead the charge in putting up oracles and reaching out to Activity developers. Their group meets again tomorrow. A warm welcome to all our NZ testers - and thank you to Martin for the introduction!
- Agreed to continue work on How to test an Activity - moving forward, things look good so far
Test result reporting instructions
Pre-meeting
Feedback on Reporting test results? Volunteers to help build/test/maintain?
During meeting
- Merged with #Activity testing instructions in discussion
- We need to make new forms for our G1G1 testing goal
Activity testing automation
See Activity testing automation
Mission/scope/focus of Community testing
What are our goals? See Community Testing#Introduction for the current strawman. After we agree on goals, we can figure out how to measure whether we're meeting them. We're already working towards these goals (or a very similar set), and should continue to - it's just sometimes useful to state these things explicitly.
Action items
- mchua to talk with sj, kimquirk, and others about what kinds of brib^H^H^H^H resources we can offer to motivate and reward testers, both tangible and intangible. (Deferred from last week on account of SJ and Kim's G1G1 workload.)