Peripherals/Energy Storage: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(lose is written with one 'o')
Line 22: Line 22:


|-
|-
| Car Batteries || Text || Inefficiencies in getting energy into and back out of the battery (You loose half the energy [http://mb-soft.com/public2/storing.html])
| Car Batteries || Text || Inefficiencies in getting energy into and back out of the battery (You lose half the energy [http://mb-soft.com/public2/storing.html])
|-
|-
| Deep Cycle Batteries || Text || Text
| Deep Cycle Batteries || Text || Text

Revision as of 14:42, 29 April 2009

In an environment where grid power may only be available for a few hours a day, or where energy generation is available but either generation or usage isn't constant an energy storage system is required.

A desirable storage technology would allow easy top-up and extraction of electricity. The input to the storage system wouldn’t necessarily need to be electrical but it would be preferable not to require a distribution system to be implemented.

For example, zinc-air fuel cells offer some interesting advantages over standard batteries, but require a zinc distribution system to be setup in conjunction with the technology.

Below is a list of technologies which offer possible solutions;

Advantages and Disadvantages

Storage Type Advantages Disadvantages
Car Batteries Text Inefficiencies in getting energy into and back out of the battery (You lose half the energy [1])
Deep Cycle Batteries Text Text
Compressed Air Text Text
Super/Ultracapacitors Ability to release quick jolts of electricity and to absorb this energy just as fast Less energy storage capacity per Kg compaired to Batteries (25 times less [2])
Technology Text Text

Links