OLPC Oceania/Evaluation/Solomons Framework: Difference between revisions
< OLPC Oceania | Evaluation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{OLPC_Oceania}} |
{{OLPC_Oceania}} |
||
<br> |
|||
<br> |
|||
= Measurable Objectives and evaluation framework – Solomon Islands example = |
= Measurable Objectives and evaluation framework – Solomon Islands example = |
||
This is a framework developed and approved by the Solomon Islands Ministry of Education. |
|||
= OLPC Trials Solomon Islands: Project Objectives and Evaluation Parameters = |
|||
{| class="prettytable" |
{| class="prettytable" |
||
Line 10: | Line 15: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| Awareness raised about OLPC and the objectives of the trial in Western Province |
| Awareness raised about OLPC and the objectives of the trial in Western Province |
||
| Ministry, teachers, sector partners and communities aware of: |
| Ministry, teachers, sector partners and communities aware of: |
||
* The vision of OLPC |
|||
* The function of OLPC/XO/XS |
* The function of OLPC/XO/XS |
||
* Objectives trial in the Western Province. |
* Objectives trial in the Western Province. |
||
| |
|||
* Consultation and briefing meetings held with the Ministry, schools and communities |
|||
* Interviews and survey |
* Interviews and survey |
||
Line 25: | Line 33: | ||
(In each sub-sector: Early Childhood, Primary, Secondary, TVET) |
(In each sub-sector: Early Childhood, Primary, Secondary, TVET) |
||
| |
|||
* The XO is used in T & L at schools and centres |
|||
* The XO is utilised in particular for some of the subjects |
* The XO is utilised in particular for some of the subjects |
||
* The XO is integrated into normal/formal T & L-formal education delivery |
* The XO is integrated into normal/formal T & L-formal education delivery |
||
Line 43: | Line 52: | ||
(g) Also assess any possible negative or non-impact; learners and teachers not using XO or only after school hours |
(g) Also assess any possible negative or non-impact; learners and teachers not using XO or only after school hours |
||
| |
|||
* Interviews and surveys with school managers, teachers, students, students, community members |
|||
* Teacher log books/diaries |
* Teacher log books/diaries |
||
* Class observations |
* Class observations |
||
Line 54: | Line 64: | ||
| To assess impact of OLPC on enrolment or attendance |
| To assess impact of OLPC on enrolment or attendance |
||
| Increased enrolment or improved attendance at selected schools compared to schools where OLPC or XO has not been introduced |
| Increased enrolment or improved attendance at selected schools compared to schools where OLPC or XO has not been introduced |
||
| |
|||
* Attendance register |
|||
Line 60: | Line 71: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| To assess impact of OLPC or XO in delivering/producing new curriculum materials/learning content |
| To assess impact of OLPC or XO in delivering/producing new curriculum materials/learning content |
||
| |
|||
* New electronic content made available (in schools) |
|||
* The school server is an effective source of content |
* The school server is an effective source of content |
||
* |
* ‘Wiki Educator’ more frequently used |
||
| Materials provided by |
|||
* School |
|||
* Ministry/curriculum |
* Ministry/curriculum |
||
* NGOs / partners of education sector |
* NGOs / partners of education sector |
||
Line 74: | Line 88: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| To assess if OLPC/XO- technology is technically feasible and sustainable |
| To assess if OLPC/XO- technology is technically feasible and sustainable |
||
| |
|||
* Teachers and students are able to use and continue to use the laptops |
|||
* Power supplies are feasible , affordable |
* Power supplies are feasible , affordable |
||
* Good quality Internet connectivity |
* Good quality Internet connectivity |
||
Line 82: | Line 97: | ||
| |
|||
* Demonstrations by students, teachers |
|||
* Technical report on power and connectivity infrastructure |
* Technical report on power and connectivity infrastructure |
||
* Options, performance, cost, |
* Options, performance, cost, |
||
Line 91: | Line 107: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| To assess impact of capacity building for teachers (and learners) in the OLPC project |
| To assess impact of capacity building for teachers (and learners) in the OLPC project |
||
| |
|||
* Training (for XO) has built sustained capacity |
|||
* Training system/schedule and methodology is effective |
* Training system/schedule and methodology is effective |
||
* Teachers are able to integrate the use of XO in formal and informal class-work |
* Teachers are able to integrate the use of XO in formal and informal class-work |
||
Line 97: | Line 114: | ||
| |
|||
* Interviews, consultations and surveys with trainers, teachers and learners |
|||
* Evaluations of training, capacity building |
* Evaluations of training, capacity building |
||
Line 104: | Line 122: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| To assess the impact of OLPC on the learning, and school environment |
| To assess the impact of OLPC on the learning, and school environment |
||
| |
|||
* Teachers and students regard the XO and OLPC project positively |
|||
* School seen more positively by the community |
* School seen more positively by the community |
||
* Teachers have improved morale |
* Teachers have improved morale |
||
Line 111: | Line 130: | ||
| |
|||
* Interviews, consultations and surveys with teachers, learners and community members |
|||
* School records, minutes of school board/committee meetings |
* School records, minutes of school board/committee meetings |
||
* Public meetings |
* Public meetings |
||
Line 121: | Line 141: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| To assess the impact of OLPC, |
| To assess the impact of OLPC, XO’s on the community |
||
| |
|||
* To assess the impact of OLPC, XO’s on the community |
|||
* Also community members involved in the use of |
* Also community members involved in the use of XO’s |
||
* Community regards the OLPC positively or negatively |
* Community regards the OLPC positively or negatively |
||
* Community have improved access to information and communication services |
* Community have improved access to information and communication services |
||
Line 129: | Line 150: | ||
| |
|||
* Interviews, consultations, surveys with community members, teachers, learners |
|||
* Minutes of school committees and boards |
* Minutes of school committees and boards |
||
* Group interviews with community members |
* Group interviews with community members |
||
* Demonstrations of parents using these |
* Demonstrations of parents using these XO’s |
||
Latest revision as of 14:32, 12 September 2009
Oceania Community - News - Content - Evaluation - Languages - Countries
Cook Islands -French Polynesia - Kiribati - Nauru - New Caledonia - Niue - Palau - Papua New Guinea - Samoa- Solomon Islands - Tonga - Tokelau - Tuvalu - Vanuatu
Cook Islands -French Polynesia - Kiribati - Nauru - New Caledonia - Niue - Palau - Papua New Guinea - Samoa- Solomon Islands - Tonga - Tokelau - Tuvalu - Vanuatu
Measurable Objectives and evaluation framework – Solomon Islands example
This is a framework developed and approved by the Solomon Islands Ministry of Education.
OLPC Trials Solomon Islands: Project Objectives and Evaluation Parameters
Objectives | Expected outputs | Indicators and instruments (how it is measured) |
Awareness raised about OLPC and the objectives of the trial in Western Province | Ministry, teachers, sector partners and communities aware of:
|
|
To assess the impact of OLPC in the area of Teaching and Learning
|
(a) Learning by Doing (b) Child-focused teaching (c) Group work/sharing/collaboration (d) Inclusion / engagement of all students (e) Curriculum changes as a result of the XO/OLPC project (f) Impacts seen in all sub-sectors, but mostly with early age education (ECE and PE) (g) Also assess any possible negative or non-impact; learners and teachers not using XO or only after school hours |
|
To assess impact of OLPC on enrolment or attendance | Increased enrolment or improved attendance at selected schools compared to schools where OLPC or XO has not been introduced |
|
To assess impact of OLPC or XO in delivering/producing new curriculum materials/learning content |
|
Materials provided by
|
To assess if OLPC/XO- technology is technically feasible and sustainable |
|
|
To assess impact of capacity building for teachers (and learners) in the OLPC project |
|
|
To assess the impact of OLPC on the learning, and school environment |
|
|
To assess the impact of OLPC, XO’s on the community |
|
|