User talk:Yamaplos/en: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::I agree with your the point about two-column translation being easier, but I'm not template-savvy enough to try to figure out the mechanics. Maybe you can talk to [[User:Homunq]] who appears to have done most of the work on that template, or maybe [[User:Xavi]] or [[User:Dupuy]] that have worked a lot on translations. |
:::I agree with your the point about two-column translation being easier, but I'm not template-savvy enough to try to figure out the mechanics. Maybe you can talk to [[User:Homunq]] who appears to have done most of the work on that template, or maybe [[User:Xavi]] or [[User:Dupuy]] that have worked a lot on translations. |
||
:::As for page-advertising, maybe the best thing is to do is to ask [[User:Walter]] to feature your effort in the [[OLPC:News]] or even on the [[The_OLPC_Wiki | main page]]. I will say that anyone who is going to make a meaningful contribution is not going to be put off by an extra mouse-click, wiki's are not really built by users who expect shop-at-home one-click checkout. Not that it isn't great when they are built to be friendly to such users, but I think you have to ask yourself how much "drive-by" traffic you can really expect. I think getting users that are fluent enough in Aymara and computer-savvy enough to contribute to a [[Pootle]] translation jam is likely to require some significant off-wiki recuriting anyway. I think the best you can do on-wiki is to use good category tags so that there is the opportunity for serendipity. I face a similar challenge with my own pet project [[Animal health]] in that there aren't many wiki-speaking, large animal vets wandering by . . . if you know one, give them my e-mail address. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 17:30, 16 April 2008 (EDT) |
:::As for page-advertising, maybe the best thing is to do is to ask [[User:Walter]] to feature your effort in the [[OLPC:News]] or even on the [[The_OLPC_Wiki | main page]]. I will say that anyone who is going to make a meaningful contribution is not going to be put off by an extra mouse-click, wiki's are not really built by users who expect shop-at-home one-click checkout. Not that it isn't great when they are built to be friendly to such users, but I think you have to ask yourself how much "drive-by" traffic you can really expect. I think getting users that are fluent enough in Aymara and computer-savvy enough to contribute to a [[Pootle]] translation jam is likely to require some significant off-wiki recuriting anyway. I think the best you can do on-wiki is to use good category tags so that there is the opportunity for serendipity. I face a similar challenge with my own pet project [[Animal health]] in that there aren't many wiki-speaking, large animal vets wandering by . . . if you know one, give them my e-mail address. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 17:30, 16 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
::::Ha ha. Point taken. I will contact the users you mention, see what can be done. No, my take as to usability is to have an easy time getting to where the good stuff is. You are entirely correct, it will be extremely hard for me to populate this project, yet sometimes we seem to be unaware how hard is for noobs to get some stuff done, and I am the more grateful for your concern for the translations template in that sense. Now, if I could just figure out how to make the generic look and feel for [[Aymara Fest]] to be in Spanish... [[User:Yamaplos|Yamaplos]] 17:41, 16 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
== translations == |
== translations == |
||
I'll make a few edits to move the translation set-up to a place where it is easier to proceed. I find it very confusing too. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 15:41, 16 April 2008 (EDT) |
I'll make a few edits to move the translation set-up to a place where it is easier to proceed. I find it very confusing too. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 15:41, 16 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 21:41, 16 April 2008
Aymara page
I created a language page stub for Aymara. Maybe this SpanAm link [1] should point there instead of to OLPC Bolivia? Cjl 02:05, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- Aymara activity is right now happening in the Bolivia page. The most I could do for an Aymara page right now would be to put some Wikipedia or CIA stuff, and a link to the Bolivia pagehich besides the fluff would be the same think as linking directly to the Bolivia page. If you don't mind too much, could you leave it as is for now? We'll probably have specific Aymara development some day, hopefully, which will fit right in. Thanks. Yamaplos 15:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
It's just that with Aymara speakers spread across Bolivia, Peru, Chile (Argentina?) it is probably best to organize language-specific information on a language-specific page that each of the country-specific pages can link to. Cjl 16:12, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- It's OK, though the real reality of the very truth is that we cannot expect any of those countries to do much for Aymara, not because they don't want to, but because, bless their hearts, they have more urgent things to do first.Yamaplos 16:19, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, I'm sure they do. However, doesn't the wiki ethos hold that the important thing is not who does the work (although contribs are clearly credited), but that the work is made accessible and easily found to all who might need it? Bolivia will benefit from Spanish localization efforts done with Peru in mind and Peru will benefit from Aymara localization effort done with Bolivia in mind, win-win. Cjl 16:26, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- You are totally right, that is why I followed most willingly your advice. Thank you for pointing me out of my one-track mind. Now I will clone your translation work to the Aymara Fest page and hope we can get two-column pages somehow. The fact that we will have 'originals' in both English and Spanish makes the usual approach complicated, and rather inconvenient. Hope there's a way to get it to work, or maybe you can try again to convince me another way is better :-) Yamaplos 16:31, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- The way I see it is that it's all about the kids, no matter what country they live in, no matter what language they speak and us "grown-ups" just need to set an example by playing well with others :-) If you want to modify the "original" language of the Aymara page into Spanish out of recognition that it will be a primary language of those able to contribute, I'm fine with that. The "original" language of most of the Spanish America pages is Spanish, and that only makes sense. It would be nice if there were more (es) to (en) translated pages for folks like me that haven't really used their Spanish since high school, but c'est la vie. Cjl 16:59, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- One problem is usability. It makes _sense_ for users that are interested in the Aymara Fest to look for it in the Bolivia page, because so far at least and in the probable future, it's Bolivian this is addressed to. Serependitiously I hope to attract circumstantial visitors to that event. Now I have to ask them to make one more click, in the name of order and proper procedure. Now the Bolivia page has no action, no voice, just like the Aymara page. All the action is in an out of the way, circumstantial page. I see most of our wiki pages developing into temples of fluff in this model. Notice that you can actually find very little information in our official pages. I was unable to get to the OLPC_Bolivia following logical links from the main laptop.org page. Oh well.
- The worst is that I agreed to it :-> Yamaplos 17:07, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- I agree with your the point about two-column translation being easier, but I'm not template-savvy enough to try to figure out the mechanics. Maybe you can talk to User:Homunq who appears to have done most of the work on that template, or maybe User:Xavi or User:Dupuy that have worked a lot on translations.
- As for page-advertising, maybe the best thing is to do is to ask User:Walter to feature your effort in the OLPC:News or even on the main page. I will say that anyone who is going to make a meaningful contribution is not going to be put off by an extra mouse-click, wiki's are not really built by users who expect shop-at-home one-click checkout. Not that it isn't great when they are built to be friendly to such users, but I think you have to ask yourself how much "drive-by" traffic you can really expect. I think getting users that are fluent enough in Aymara and computer-savvy enough to contribute to a Pootle translation jam is likely to require some significant off-wiki recuriting anyway. I think the best you can do on-wiki is to use good category tags so that there is the opportunity for serendipity. I face a similar challenge with my own pet project Animal health in that there aren't many wiki-speaking, large animal vets wandering by . . . if you know one, give them my e-mail address. Cjl 17:30, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- Ha ha. Point taken. I will contact the users you mention, see what can be done. No, my take as to usability is to have an easy time getting to where the good stuff is. You are entirely correct, it will be extremely hard for me to populate this project, yet sometimes we seem to be unaware how hard is for noobs to get some stuff done, and I am the more grateful for your concern for the translations template in that sense. Now, if I could just figure out how to make the generic look and feel for Aymara Fest to be in Spanish... Yamaplos 17:41, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- One problem is usability. It makes _sense_ for users that are interested in the Aymara Fest to look for it in the Bolivia page, because so far at least and in the probable future, it's Bolivian this is addressed to. Serependitiously I hope to attract circumstantial visitors to that event. Now I have to ask them to make one more click, in the name of order and proper procedure. Now the Bolivia page has no action, no voice, just like the Aymara page. All the action is in an out of the way, circumstantial page. I see most of our wiki pages developing into temples of fluff in this model. Notice that you can actually find very little information in our official pages. I was unable to get to the OLPC_Bolivia following logical links from the main laptop.org page. Oh well.
- Yes, I'm sure they do. However, doesn't the wiki ethos hold that the important thing is not who does the work (although contribs are clearly credited), but that the work is made accessible and easily found to all who might need it? Bolivia will benefit from Spanish localization efforts done with Peru in mind and Peru will benefit from Aymara localization effort done with Bolivia in mind, win-win. Cjl 16:26, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
translations
I'll make a few edits to move the translation set-up to a place where it is easier to proceed. I find it very confusing too. Cjl 15:41, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- I've created the OLPC_Bolivia/lang-en page in a form that should be ready for ongoign translation work. The translation status template has a status of "incomplete" which will cause the directions material to appear at the top of the page. Cjl 16:12, 16 April 2008 (EDT)