Classroom 2.0 XO Educator Group: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Added section on US schools) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[XO_Giving | back to XO Giving]] |
[[XO_Giving | back to XO Giving]] |
||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
== EVENTS == |
== EVENTS == |
||
== US Schools: Strategies for adoption == |
|||
In order to make headway for XO adoption in K-12 schools in the United States, applicability to "No Child Left Behind" is an essential first step. While pilot programs and benefits to student learning and classroom instruction are important, in some real sense these are corollaries to what matters most to the bottom line of school districts: the federally mandated "No Child Left Behind" program. |
|||
Please expand on this section with your ideas of how advocates of OLPC can speak in the language of school district administrators, boards, and faculty members regarding their school objectives. How would the OLPC improve school test scores? How could OLPC improve "scientifically based research" in the classroom? |
|||
== LINKS == |
== LINKS == |
||
Revision as of 16:16, 14 December 2007
Welcome Classroom 2.0 XO User Group!
Add information you think we'll want to discuss below.
NEWS
My XO computer arrived on... (can't wait to fill this in!)
EVENTS
US Schools: Strategies for adoption
In order to make headway for XO adoption in K-12 schools in the United States, applicability to "No Child Left Behind" is an essential first step. While pilot programs and benefits to student learning and classroom instruction are important, in some real sense these are corollaries to what matters most to the bottom line of school districts: the federally mandated "No Child Left Behind" program.
Please expand on this section with your ideas of how advocates of OLPC can speak in the language of school district administrators, boards, and faculty members regarding their school objectives. How would the OLPC improve school test scores? How could OLPC improve "scientifically based research" in the classroom?