OLPC:Administrators: Difference between revisions
(removed obsolete text; the page in question is now protected.) |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* I've been doing some reworks with the [[Ask OLPC a Question]] area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the [[... about XXX]] pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins? |
* I've been doing some reworks with the [[Ask OLPC a Question]] area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the [[... about XXX]] pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins? |
||
*: No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable. |
*: No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable. |
||
* FYI: People are still posting general questions on the [[Talk:The_OLPC_Wiki]] page, even though it is supposed to redirect to [[Talk:Main Page]] (which makes it something of a black hole for questions). Is it possible to disable editing on that discussion page (or merge the two)? —[[User:Leejc|Joe]] 11:51, 7 September 2007 (EDT) |
|||
=== Where are our readers from? === |
=== Where are our readers from? === |
||
Revision as of 23:19, 11 January 2008
This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. Some notes for administrators. You can see a list of admins at Special:Listusers.
For older requests, see the archive.
Nominations for adminship
Adminship should be no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the logs, the delete and protect tabs, and the block tool; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.
Kim Quirk
Project manager; doesn't want to use sysop tools ;-) but needs them sometimes.
- Support, natch. --Sj leave me a message 17:48, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- Support, by all means! --Chihyu 18:10, 11 January 2008 (EST)
Bernie
X, h-->u bindings, transparency, and couch expert. All around good guy and clear writer.
Comments
- Support as nominator. --Sj leave me a message 11:58, 1 January 2008 (EST)
- Support, enthusiastic and professional. --Chihyu 18:12, 11 January 2008 (EST)
Zdenek
Long time content contributor, php hacker. Not an active Wikipedian, but uses wikis regularly; trustworthy and prolific.
Comments
- Support. --Sj leave me a message 12:01, 1 January 2008 (EST)
Questions
- I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
- Yes, it helps.
- I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
- Ahh, interesting point. We should do this.
- I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
- No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
Where are our readers from?
Some time ago I raised the question about who's reading what - and more importantly (for me) from where. (See here). My question originates in that knowing that kind of information we may be able either to tune content or promote/demote links in the front page, faq, etc. For example, if I knew that it was argies rarely visit Argentina's page, it could mean that they are looking for other kind of news, data, whatever; but at least I'd know they aren't reading it - maybe it's just lack of local diffusion.--Xavi 20:49, 20 January 2007 (EST)
- A project for the stats team...
Current bureaucrats
see also: Special:Listusers
- Cjb (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Felice (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Jg (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Krstic (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Mako (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Sj (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Walter (Bureaucrat, Sysop)
- Wmb@firmworks.com (Bureaucrat, Sysop)