OLPC:Volunteer Infrastructure Group/2008-08-17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Meetings]] |
||
[[Category:Infrastructure gang]] |
[[Category:Infrastructure gang]] |
Latest revision as of 02:35, 12 September 2008
13:30 -!- mode/#olpc-admin [+o hhardy] by ChanServ 13:31 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: OLPC's Volunteer Infrastructure Group meeting Sunday 2:00 pm EDT -04:00 UCT 13:57 <@hhardy> hello all 13:58 <@hhardy> I am giving people 10 minutes to assemble, if we don't have a critical mass we will reschedule 14:02 * gregdek hullos. 14:03 <@hhardy> hi nobody but us so far will reschedule if we dont get more in the next ~7 minutes 14:03 < gregdek> Okay. 14:03 < gregdek> Perhaps this is not the best time after all. 14:03 <@hhardy> in lieu of a better time I will go back to tuesday at 4pm where we had a decent turnout 14:04 < CanoeBerry_> Hi Guys, can't stay for long, but got a few min! 14:04 <@hhardy> hi we are short of people going to reschedule unless we see a few more in the next few min 14:04 <@hhardy> canoe is tuesday at 4pm a better time for you? 14:05 -!- Culseg [1893d58d@67.207.141.120] has joined #olpc-admin 14:05 <@hhardy> hi culseg 14:05 < Culseg> greetings, time for adjenda add? 14:05 < CanoeBerry_> Tues 4pm's easy for me. Adric can do every Tue/Wed/Thur PM (preferably early evenings) 14:05 < CanoeBerry_> Or later afternoons... 14:06 <@hhardy> is tuesday 5:15pm better? 14:06 <@hhardy> culseg: sure 14:06 < CanoeBerry_> Totally your call. 5PM? 14:07 <@hhardy> I want a bit of slack in case my regular sysadmin mtng runs over 14:07 < Culseg> moderation of Forum (and future Fora?) 14:07 <@hhardy> forum meaning the mailing list? 14:07 < Culseg> no, the Forum that mburns started 14:07 <@hhardy> any further agena items? 14:07 <@hhardy> forum that mburns started? url? 14:08 < CanoeBerry_> Volunteers who can fix the 'L' key that broke on both my computers ;) 14:08 < Culseg> http://en.forum.laptop.org/ 14:08 <@hhardy> what are you doing with your l key? 14:08 <@hhardy> giv'n 'em 'ell? 14:08 < CanoeBerry_> Nevermind, but yeah what are the odds :) 14:09 <@hhardy> dude you need to send those to me for repair 14:09 <@hhardy> otherwise your LOL's will become just "O" 14:09 < CanoeBerry_> :) 14:10 <@hhardy> ok here's the agenda for today: 14:10 <@hhardy> 1) purpose of the group 14:10 <@hhardy> 2) introductions 14:10 <@hhardy> 3) general guidelines 14:10 <@hhardy> 4) resources 14:10 <@hhardy> 4.1 website 14:10 <@hhardy> 4.2 wiki 14:10 <@hhardy> 4.3 mailing lists 14:10 <@hhardy> 4.4 rt 14:10 <@hhardy> 4.5 trac and git 14:10 <@hhardy> 5) areas to subdelegate 14:10 <@hhardy> 5.1 trac and git 14:10 <@hhardy> 5.2 wiki 14:10 <@hhardy> 5.3 mailing list 14:10 <@hhardy> 5.4 IRC 14:10 <@hhardy> 5.5 rt 14:10 <@hhardy> 5.6 notes and documentation 14:10 <@hhardy> 6) Culseg: forum moderation 14:10 <@hhardy> 7) future plans 14:10 <@hhardy> 8) ACTION ITEMS 14:11 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: Purpose of OLPC's Volunteer Infrastructure Group 14:12 <@hhardy> My basic ideas as far as purpose: 14:12 <@hhardy> Make the sysadmin's job easier 14:12 <@hhardy> Improve the infrastructure systems through "many hands/many minds" 14:13 <@hhardy> strengthen ties with the community 14:13 <@hhardy> anyone want to add/criticise? 14:13 < gregdek> +1. 14:13 < gregdek> Simple. :) 14:13 <@hhardy> anything further? 14:13 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: Introductions 14:14 <@hhardy> I am Henry Edward Hardy 14:14 <@hhardy> Old sysadmin going back to ARPAnet: NIC: HEH 14:14 <@hhardy> former senior sysadmin for Verio 14:14 <@hhardy> wrote my Master's thesis on the History of the Net 14:14 <@hhardy> OLPC sysadmin 14:15 <@hhardy> next? 14:15 < gregdek> Greg DeKoenigsberg 14:15 < gregdek> community guy for Red Hat 14:15 < gregdek> founder of the Fedora Project board 14:15 < gregdek> layabout, ne'er-do-well, braggart, blackguard 14:15 < gregdek> next? 14:16 <@hhardy> gregdek we can stipulate that for everyone here :) 14:16 < gregdek> ;) 14:16 <@hhardy> <--- points canoeBerry 14:16 < CanoeBerry_> CanoeBerry who has to run now unfortunately, but will be more in attendance at future mtgs!! 14:17 <@hhardy> ok thx for stopping in 14:17 < Culseg> OK 14:17 <@hhardy> culseg <--- 14:17 < Culseg> Sandy Culver 14:18 < Culseg> learned and forgot Red Hat 4 or 5. linux 14:18 < Culseg> previous moderator experience and FAQ maintainer, many years ago 14:19 < Culseg> a moderate person with strong people skills and clear values 14:19 <@hhardy> isn't that the conservative's definition of a radical? :) 14:19 < Culseg> a business coach style advisor 14:20 <@hhardy> and support gang stalwart 14:20 < gregdek> Any others? 14:21 < Culseg> yes, 8 months SG volunteer 14:21 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: general guidelines 14:21 < gregdek> :) 14:21 <@hhardy> It occurs to me that we should put down some general guidelines along the lines of an AUP 14:22 < gregdek> Yes. 14:22 <@hhardy> I think it is easier to enforce an AUP rather than an NDA in the absence of an employee relationship 14:22 < gregdek> Yes, agreed. 14:22 < gregdek> Something as simple as you can make it. 14:23 <@hhardy> since we share network resources with MIT will probably base this on their AUP + SAGE's template AUP's 14:25 <@hhardy> don't have more to say on this as yet 14:25 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: resources 14:26 <@hhardy> I want to make sure people are familiar with the public facing resources of olpc 14:26 <@hhardy> namely: web, wiki, trac, git, mail, mailman, rt 14:26 < gregdek> From what perspective? 14:27 <@hhardy> these are tools we can use and also candidates for us to sysadmin 14:27 -!- nteon [~nteon@dhcp-47-122.media.mit.edu] has joined #olpc-admin 14:28 <@hhardy> welcome nteon 14:28 < nteon> hi fellows, I am bobby, a friendly summer intern here at 1cc 14:28 <@hhardy> we have done introductions but please say a few lines about yourself 14:28 <@hhardy> thanks (I shanghaied bobby when he walked in just now at 1cc) 14:29 <@hhardy> sending nteon the agenda 14:30 < gregdek> So I think people know about these systems, right? 14:30 <@hhardy> the people on this conference now do 14:30 <@hhardy> I am going to skip delegating particular tasks now as we are below critical mass 14:31 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: notes and documentation 14:31 <@hhardy> we can use an administative type person to make meeting notes and transcripts, maintain mailing list and work on wikizing documentation 14:32 <@hhardy> there's a lot of stuff on internal wiki which should be traged and copyied or transcluded over to the public wiki I think for this project 14:33 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: culseg: forum moderation 14:34 <@hhardy> culseg: <--- is all ears 14:34 < Culseg> all I can say is that others are needed to moderate Forum 14:35 <@hhardy> forum.l.o? 14:35 < Culseg> yes 14:35 <@hhardy> that is not controlled by me 14:35 < Culseg> http://en.forum.laptop.org/ 14:36 < Culseg> control is not always as important as influence 14:36 < gregdek> +1/ 14:36 <@hhardy> that is hosted at orgegon state I think we can certainly find out who are the responsibles 14:37 < Culseg> great, mburns has done a great job 14:37 < gregdek> mburns should be in these meetings. :) 14:37 * gregdek thinks that OSU could end up being a focal point for a lot of this kind of community sysadmin work. 14:38 <@hhardy> culseg want to invite him for tuesday? 5:15 pm next meeting 14:38 <@hhardy> oh look ACTION ITEM 14:38 < Culseg> sure, but your 'infuence' invite would be a higher value! 14:38 <@hhardy> ok I will send something to him if I can find an email 14:39 < Culseg> will send later 14:39 * gregdek goes to make sure that 5:15pm Tue is on his calendar... 14:39 <@hhardy> ACTION ITEM hhardy to invite mburns to next i-g mtng 14:39 <@hhardy> ACTION ITEM hhardy to draft AUP 14:39 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: future plans 14:40 <@hhardy> this is where each person can say where they would like this initiative to go 14:40 <@hhardy> I would like to see a model that can be emulated by all OLPC'ish orgs 14:41 <@hhardy> such as Nepal, OLPC-Europe, OLPC-India, etc 14:41 <@hhardy> I know Europe could benefit from some volunteer sysadmin support 14:41 < gregdek> A good question: 14:41 < gregdek> Should we centralize or decentralize? 14:42 < gregdek> Fedora chooses to centralize resources because it's easier to secure, and we don't split the hands. 14:42 < gregdek> Not sure if that's possible in this case. 14:42 <@hhardy> I'd like to learn more about how this works in Fedora 14:43 <@hhardy> both tendancies are at work at OLPC 14:43 <@hhardy> on the one hand, to push everything out to the deployments and user community 14:43 <@hhardy> on the other hand to centralize and become like a "real bueiness" 14:43 <@hhardy> s/bueiness/business/ 14:44 < gregdek> hhardy: You've got Mike McGrath's contact info. 14:44 <@hhardy> yes we exchanged one email 14:44 < gregdek> Keep going. :) 14:44 < gregdek> I think it's a decision you will make over time. 14:44 < gregdek> It doesn't make sense to centralize until you've got a big enough team to legitimately handle all resources. 14:45 <@hhardy> in terms of scope I am primarily accountable to the OLPC Association and they are answerable to the OLPC Foundation 14:45 <@hhardy> so that is whose interests I primarily serve organizationally 14:46 <@hhardy> I have a mandate from Chuck to do whatever possible to support Europe and in practice I am held answerable by the entire ocmmunity 14:46 <@hhardy> so I guess I would pick "concentric rings" approach 14:47 <@hhardy> inner ring: the association 14:47 * gregdek nods. 14:47 <@hhardy> next ring: foundation and board members 14:47 < gregdek> I've always grown structures like this organically. 14:47 <@hhardy> next ring: sugar and activity developers 14:47 < gregdek> Find your volunteers, and figure out what structure suits them. 14:47 <@hhardy> next ring: country deployments 14:48 < gregdek> With an emphasis on giving them real tasks asap. 14:48 <@hhardy> next ring: OLPC userbase 14:48 <@hhardy> coderanger used to admin trac as an intern and I'm inclined to let him take it again as a volunteer as he has expressed interest 14:49 <@hhardy> adric and someone else have been talking with canoeberry about helping with rt 14:49 < gregdek> Yep. 14:49 <@hhardy> I havent had too many more people step up with specific areas they want to take the lead on 14:50 < gregdek> Haven't advertised openings yet. ;) 14:50 < gregdek> At least, not heavily. 14:50 <@hhardy> seth sent the transcript of the last meeting to christoph at olpc news and I sent him the invite to this meeting 14:50 < gregdek> So lemme ask this question: 14:50 <@hhardy> but I didnt see anything on olpcnews yet 14:51 < gregdek> All things in time. 14:51 < gregdek> But to some degree, you're preaching to the converted there. 14:51 < gregdek> But lemme ask this: 14:51 < gregdek> If someone showed up and said "I'm a 19th level elf warrior/sysadmin and I want to join your quest..." 14:51 < gregdek> ...do you know exactly where you'd put him? 14:51 <@hhardy> adminning a mud? 14:52 < gregdek> ;) 14:52 * gregdek . o O ( wow, when's the last time I logged into a mud? ) 14:52 < nteon> mud.laptop.org 14:52 < gregdek> srsly? 14:52 < nteon> not yet :) 14:53 < gregdek> Aw. Disappointed. ;) 14:53 <@hhardy> I updated the games page on wiki recently to suggest porting roguelike and nethacklike and muds to xo 14:53 < gregdek> Anyway. That's the question, hhardy. If I spend my time sending geeks your way, how long will it take you to bootstrap them and make them useful? 14:53 <@hhardy> <--- was wizard on the original LPmud 14:54 * gregdek preferred muses. :) 14:54 <@hhardy> we can take 4-6 people now 14:54 < gregdek> All right. Then I will start chasing people down. 14:54 <@hhardy> and any number of wikipedians 14:55 <@hhardy> there is already a wiki admin procedure 14:55 <@hhardy> looking for link 14:56 <@hhardy> hmmm I will ping sj for the page address 14:56 -!- hhardy changed the topic of #olpc-admin to: ACTION ITEMS 14:56 <@hhardy> I see three so far 14:56 <@hhardy> hhardy invite mburns 14:57 <@hhardy> hhardy draft AUP 14:57 <@hhardy> hhardy find wiki admin app 14:57 <@hhardy> and gregdek invite folks as appropriate 14:57 <@hhardy> anythng further? 14:57 < gregdek> I think that covers it for now. 14:58 <@hhardy> next meeting: Tuesday, 5:15 pm EDT -04:00 UCT same bat-time, same bat-channel 14:58 <@hhardy> well same bat-channel anyway 14:58 <@hhardy> thanks for coming all 14:58 <@hhardy> anything final? 14:59 < gregdek> Not from my end. 14:59 <@hhardy> ok thanks see you tuesday 14:59 < nteon> "Grabbing the handle of an XO you bludgeon your opponent to death with it" 14:59 <@hhardy> "you are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike" 15:00 <@hhardy> cheers 15:34 -!- Culseg [1893d58d@67.207.141.120] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client] 15:58 -!- CanoeBerry_ [~Canoe@c-66-30-3-48.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] 16:04 -!- isforinsects [~isforinse@wireless-19-201.media.mit.edu] has joined #olpc-admin 16:08 -!- nteon [~nteon@dhcp-47-122.media.mit.edu] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] 16:16 -!- CanoeBerry [CanoeBerry@wireless-64.media.mit.edu] has joined #olpc-admin 16:19 -!- nteon [~nteon@wireless-19-76.media.mit.edu] has joined #olpc-admin 19:29 -!- adric [~adric@atlanta.national-net.com] has joined #olpc-admin 19:30 <@hhardy> hi adric 19:30 <@hhardy> next volunteer infrastructure group meeting will be tuesday at 5:15pm edt 19:30 < adric> morning :) good meeting? 19:30 < adric> Okay, cool, thanks. 19:31 <@hhardy> only a few people showed up 19:31 <@hhardy> was ok 19:31 <@hhardy> sunday may not be best time 19:32 < adric> Sure, did someone get a tx or some minutes? 19:38 * adric rejects some CNN spam from help@, whee. 19:38 <@hhardy> yes I have it logged I will send to olpc-sysadmin@laptop.org list 19:39 <@hhardy> are you on that? 19:39 < adric> I am, yes, thanks