User talk:Sj/Archive2007: Difference between revisions
(→Obsolete Template: there is one: Template:Dated) |
JordanCrouse (talk | contribs) (→Obsolete Template: Response) |
||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
: There's one already: [[Template:Dated]] : <nowiki>{{dated}}</nowiki> |
: There's one already: [[Template:Dated]] : <nowiki>{{dated}}</nowiki> |
||
: Sorry to post here :) --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 17:42, 11 April 2007 (EDT) |
: Sorry to post here :) --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 17:42, 11 April 2007 (EDT) |
||
:: Hmm - I'm not sure if thats exactly what I was looking for. I mean, the LinuxBIOS stuff just isn't out of date, we've purposely killed it. We don't want to leave doubt in anybody's mind that this information is still even remotely valid. The information should only remain for posterity. I'm thinking that an <nowiki>{{obsolete}}</nowiki> template would say exactly that, and possibly provide a link to the newer information, if it exists (i.e - LinuxBIOS pages would link to OpenFirmware pages) and such. - [[User:JordanCrouse|JordanCrouse]] ([[User talk:JordanCrouse|Talk to me!]]) 19:13, 16 April 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:13, 16 April 2007
You may talk to me here, but check my status to see whether I'm around. See my userpage for other ways to contact me if you need something in a hurry (email is best for anything not urgent). Sj
Hey
Hey- Thanks for your help, it's refreshing to have some collaboration.
I'd like to talk to you more about the include tags you mentioned before. Those could prove to be quite useful.
Also, I like what you've done with the sidebar. Portions of it may or may not be temporary depending on how we decide to set up the front page. Walter and I had discussed setting it up like the main page of fr.wikipedia.org. I really like the organization going on there. Everything is right at your fingertips, and it's still very navigable. I had a different approach than what they had though (I think)- My idea is to modularize the page into elements (or blocks, or cells, or whatever you want to call them). Say we categorize the entire wiki into a dozen super categories. Each category would have it's own template (or page, or whatever). That way the main page can be just an index of what blocks are included instead of a bunch of ugly html. Am I discovering something that's already in use? Is this a good/bad/superlative idea? Let me know what you think. Thanks! --Aburton 18:39, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
OLPCities
I received your comments. Thanks. OLPCities is an open project. Everybody (some anonymous...) can help, create content etc. etc. We hope that, in the future, we can use the MIT(?) OLPC server (I believe that there are one available) to upload all the material. Our server can be not good enought if we have a big trafic (we are optimist...). --Americo , 19 September 2006
refactoring love
content page ideas on my user page. Phoebe 01:22, 12 October 2006 (EDT)
A question
Is there a preliminary list of new features I can review somewhere? From my point of view, getting a better idea of the Journal, and more generally: how content will be deployed. For example can our software tie into the depolyment mechanism. So content that has been downloaded and is displayed in our software can reference other content that the student hasn't downloaded yet. --Scott C.
- How would you want to reference software on the network that hasn't yet been downloaded? There will be visibility of content on the mesh and server, at least via an index with basic metadata about the files. Sj talk 19:48, 10 December 2006 (EST)
Notes
Local copies of text with push updates, changes when others change. Personal wikis with small groups/clusters. Synch of pages across wikis. Diffs pushed to email servers, pulled down to rev control.
Songbird, etc for exposing, sharing music. Post-v6 IP sharing. Version and data problems... doing away with net file systems.
olpc
Hi,
I am an astronomy graduate student and educator at Portugal. I'd like very much to contribute to the OLPC project with my knowledge in communicating astronomy. I give various lectures, courses, workshops and so forth.
Hoping to hear from you.
- José Raeiro
- www.raeiro.com
- Hello José! Welcome to our wiki. Please create an account here and come back soon. I would love to have you contribute to our project. Perhaps you can help start a page on Astronomy and how to teach it to children from scratch. Sj talk 22:49, 25 January 2007 (EST)
Interwiki
Hi,
about interwiki support is this feature turn on ?...if is not can it be set up..? Thank you. ill wait for your commments.
It needs a slight database change; we will do this soon. Sj talk 22:49, 25 January 2007 (EST)
games
see Game development ...
Old templates :
General information Frequently Asked Questions | News | Development team | Getting involved | Feedback | Community portal | OLPC philosophy |
OlpcProject
Hi,
I create an OlpcProject:Educational ideas page for Pedagogical ideas. Could you see it, please, and talk me what do you think about it ?
Thanks -- Zyacat 22:12, 16 February 2007 (EST)
Software projects
Are my latest editions on Software projects in line with what you had in mind?
Also, what about all the other stuff at http://dev.laptop.org ? I'm retiscent to include some projects (ie: linux-mm-cc and such) given their 'low-level' nature.--Xavi 13:05, 19 February 2007 (EST)
WiXi
can Summer_of_Code be updated to include WiXi as candidate? sooner action will encourage better student proposals..
(last year twexter was included as candidate for SOC 2006, but on the very last day.. thus student proposals were weak.. this year proposals could be stronger if twexter/WiXi could be included sooner.. I met with Alexander Gelbukh yesterday, he's eager to mentor and already listed as a Google mentor in Mexico.. thanks:) Duke 13:12, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Library strings
I extracted the 'visible' strings from the library... put them in [[User:Xavi/Library strings#Table format]] and [[User:Xavi/Library strings#PO format]] (reviewed Localization/Library strings)... take your pick! :) --Xavi 21:12, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- Through with the biology section, actually it's more botanical & biomes—of which I thought I knew enough... did the best I could, should be reviewed. Again, they are in table and PO format :) --Xavi 03:51, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Translation
Hi, Xavi
please let me know how to add Korean translation to http://www.laptop.org/. The guideline says use PO file, but how to write it, PO file for Korean?
Thanks..
PO-file-naming-with-or-without-dashes-or-what?
They sure look ugly... I just followed Walter's naming convention... Personally I would've gone the sub-pages road... but that just swaps / for -... --Xavi 01:01, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Update the translated content on the www.laptop.org
Hi, Sj
Thanks for making a user page for me. BTW, I've made the final review of the translations for zh-CN version of the web www.laptop.org with some corrections. Could you make them online? I think that it is controlled by the olpc team member. The translation works for korean and portuguese have the same problems. All needs full update. Thanks! -- user:ScottZ 05:05, 07 April 2007 (EDT)
Obsolete Template
We sure could use a "obsolete" template to mark some of the more out of date pages, such as
And so on, and so forth. Thanks. - JordanCrouse (Talk to me!) 17:13, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
- There's one already: Template:Dated : {{dated}}
- Sorry to post here :) --Xavi 17:42, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
- Hmm - I'm not sure if thats exactly what I was looking for. I mean, the LinuxBIOS stuff just isn't out of date, we've purposely killed it. We don't want to leave doubt in anybody's mind that this information is still even remotely valid. The information should only remain for posterity. I'm thinking that an {{obsolete}} template would say exactly that, and possibly provide a link to the newer information, if it exists (i.e - LinuxBIOS pages would link to OpenFirmware pages) and such. - JordanCrouse (Talk to me!) 19:13, 16 April 2007 (EDT)