OLPC:Policy project: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (typos)
(fixed bad ref to delete)
Line 4: Line 4:
* [[OLPC:PR]] - [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]]
* [[OLPC:PR]] - [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]]
* [[OLPC:FC]] - [[OLPC:featured content|featured content]]
* [[OLPC:FC]] - [[OLPC:featured content|featured content]]
* [[OLPC:CfR]] - [[OLPC:Content for Review|Content for Review]] (a first-cut review that sends things to [[category:delete|deletion]], peer review, or cleanup.
* [[OLPC:CfR]] - [[OLPC:Content for Review|Content for Review]] (a first-cut review that sends things to [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:Pages_for_deletion deletion], peer review, or cleanup.)
* [[OLPC:5P]] - the [OLPC:Five principles|]]
* [[OLPC:5P]] - the [OLPC:Five principles|]]
* [[OLPC:Policies]] - an overview and guidelines
* [[OLPC:Policies]] - an overview and guidelines

Revision as of 19:47, 17 April 2008

Policy and templates

We need to add a few policies here.

from irc, for ffm

<_sj_> I'd like to migrate some FA, Community-Portal, and RfA templates
<_sj_> ffm has been working on language-request templates (from [m:])
<_sj_> also peer review and media-licensing templates
* neskaya shudders at the letters RfA.
* _freelikegnu is now known as freelikegnu
<_sj_> well, I mainly agree with you
<_sj_> I do want a "pages for review" instead of an AfD and "permission requests" instead of rfa
* neskaya nods.
<neskaya> That makes a bit more sense.
<_sj_> but a template for "here's what this user is doing and is up to" is helpful
<_sj_> see for instance all of the red-linked userpages on [[Requests for permissions]] on the current wiki
<_sj_> at any rate, we're closer to reasonable process for that page than for peer review or meta-policy (here's where the policies are!) or meta-faq (here's where the faq's are!)
* mvn071 (n=mvn071@vijn.xs4all.nl) has joined #olpc
<neskaya> mmhm.
* bgola` (n=bgola@189.79.52.38) has joined #olpc
<_sj_> and to ease the load on our email queues, "contact us" should be closer to a three-page heirarchy that pushes people to community outlets when possible, than the current "here are email addresses to spam!" offering