Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • ** Get some peer review.
    4 KB (675 words) - 15:56, 30 May 2008
  • Of the many values of scale, the foremost is the child as teacher. Peer-to-peer learning is one of the best ways to leverage children. The reach of such co Help us review the '''new''' [http://laptop.org/ OLPC website]. We have versions in [[PO-l
    37 KB (3,014 words) - 06:35, 21 November 2009
  • ...econdly, preserving the original text in the translation may simplify peer review and help with maintenance. ...n category]] thus allowing other translators to find them and collaborate, review, make comments, etc. on them.
    29 KB (4,252 words) - 02:03, 20 August 2008
  • I hope the OLPC people will never forget they come from a peer group with an average 140+ IQ and that the vast majority of human beings ha ...ttp://www.techreview.com/video/ November 2006 OLPC video], at ''Technology Review'' you learn that many students in the developing world might only attend sc
    16 KB (2,679 words) - 18:07, 14 January 2012
  • (Need better peer to peer sharing capability in the base XO unit, to allow easy serving of PDF's, fil I saw an review that stated the XO automatically does disk cleanup. Maybe it does it as a
    149 KB (25,905 words) - 12:02, 22 January 2013
  • ...ipants'' and should also consider how the issues would be judged in a peer review process where the ethical standards of the profession would be applied. ...separate from legal or administrative procedures and insulated from legal review or proceedings to allow the profession to counsel and discipline its own me
    55 KB (7,498 words) - 06:20, 5 July 2007
  • # XO lib testing : final review before tomorrow's goals question about peer review. in this context, it should be thought of in the sense of : is it just for
    17 KB (2,526 words) - 17:42, 12 February 2008
  • '''Quality:''' A “Curriculum Review System” to be implemented Fall of 2007 will use master teachers, users, a ...aborative curriculum development, built on Xwiki. Enhanced search, a peer review system, and group collaboration tools are on the way, probably later this y
    4 KB (554 words) - 22:31, 19 August 2007
  • Of the many values of scale, the foremost is the child as teacher. Peer-to-peer learning is one of the best ways to leverage children. The reach of such co ...ogie permite copilului sa ajunga la statul de profesor. Conexiunea peer-to-peer, ce permite conexiunea dintre oricare 2 sisteme, este cea mai buna modalita
    17 KB (2,848 words) - 11:53, 18 October 2007
  • ==Review Squad== Would you and [[user:Delucks|Meredith]] be interested in working on the Review Squad logo? --[[User:Nlee|Nikki]] 17:40, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
    11 KB (1,843 words) - 10:39, 14 September 2008
  • ...ess conference with Negroponte, Annan breaks the handle. Time for a design review." ...es pop out of the box, they will make a mesh network of their own, peer-to-peer. This is something initially developed at MIT and the Media Lab. We are als
    35 KB (4,546 words) - 16:46, 11 October 2007
  • * [http://peproox.nirmalvihar.info Peer Editing Exchange] ...ght be found/written. It could be used, for example, to remind children to review and update mind-maps to stop knowledge fading from memory, which was acquir
    12 KB (1,705 words) - 17:31, 1 January 2008
  • ...and unreliable information on the internet. Furthermore, the virtues of a peer reviewed textbook should be taken with a grain of salt. The information in ...o buy at a stated discount from those prices. Analysis in Harvard Business Review.--[[User:Mokurai|Mokurai]] 18:36, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
    23 KB (3,869 words) - 09:21, 17 October 2007
  • ...5 16:16:15 * _sj| has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) ...add/remove custom packages from the build without going through a lengthy review process
    93 KB (14,484 words) - 00:13, 26 October 2007
  • ...ess conference with Negroponte, Annan breaks the handle. Time for a design review." ...es pop out of the box, they will make a mesh network of their own, peer-to-peer. This is something initially developed at MIT and the Media Lab. We are als
    35 KB (5,105 words) - 12:19, 1 June 2012
  • different levels of peer and/or expert review.
    5 KB (802 words) - 20:24, 10 February 2008
  • ...d to function well in any environment, they work better if a resource-rich peer (the school server) is available, providing a library, centralized network ...d accounting procedures and systems in accordance with US GAAP;<br/>• Review and implementation of financial systems controls that will complement the i
    21 KB (2,792 words) - 22:17, 24 January 2008
  • ...thering content for us through their content-authoring arm, and pursuing a peer tutoring/mentoring program through OLPC communities to allow volunteer ment ''review, updates, analysis, feedback''
    4 KB (483 words) - 12:49, 13 September 2008
  • ...here, without oil munching diesels. It applies to the forthcoming peer-to-peer, at-cost internet infrastrcture. (see http://openfarmtech.org/index.php?tit ...l be 300 sq feet of collector space- but we need to test this through peer review.
    21 KB (3,453 words) - 14:28, 31 March 2008
  • ...an, simple, visual, prominent but unobtrusive, passively present for ready review, active, and responsive to changing conditions. These aspects are not all ...lemented as part of the new shell, for both efficiency and usability, as a peer of the Neighbourhood/Friends/Home/Activity zoom views. It's not just anothe
    19 KB (3,193 words) - 16:31, 1 March 2011
  • {{peer-review-nav}} ...ntent not ready to be featured may need to go through explicit [[OLPC:peer review]] first. Activity authors and contributors should look at the [[OLPC:guide
    2 KB (361 words) - 22:31, 20 August 2008
  • ...iew]] and specific sister pages [[OLPC:project review]] and [[OLPC:website review]], could use guidelines for various types of pages and content &mdash; what
    2 KB (254 words) - 09:52, 22 February 2009
  • Active learning discussions next week help review trials [[OLPC:peer review|community review process]] for projects and more
    14 KB (2,014 words) - 12:49, 13 September 2008
  • ...ed content|Featured content]] &nbsp;&middot;&nbsp; [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]] | [[OLPC:Brilliant pages|Brilliant wiki-pages]]
    338 bytes (45 words) - 21:46, 18 August 2008
  • We need a process for general peer review of any proposal, overview, collection, project, website, or implementation == submitting a page or project for peer review ==
    1 KB (170 words) - 21:41, 13 February 2008
  • Ask a peer to review, or other people in #olpc-support-gang.
    624 bytes (107 words) - 03:18, 11 February 2008
  • | [[Image:wiki-banner-4.gif|140px]] || [[OLPC:Peer review]] || from Gurch
    1 KB (143 words) - 22:36, 13 February 2008
  • ...ans in 1997. CPRS provides a single interface for health care providers to review and update a patient's medical record and to place orders, including medica ...r transmission to the National Quality Assurance Database for Headquarters review and tracking.
    235 KB (33,830 words) - 10:15, 26 October 2011
  • * [[OLPC:PR]] - [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]] ...to [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:Pages_for_deletion deletion], peer review, or cleanup.)
    2 KB (319 words) - 03:51, 17 December 2008
  • ...lf-baked, untested, back-of-an-envelope stuff - no promises it works! Peer review, comments, feedback, or criticisms are all welcome.'''
    12 KB (2,038 words) - 15:59, 3 July 2009
  • {{peer-review-nav}} * User review and input : to discuss and review projects for brilliance, see [[OLPC:Featured content]].
    5 KB (764 words) - 21:45, 18 August 2008
  • ...here we can embark upon later-stage trials for feedback and polish. Please review the [[#Notes]] below and please report any new bugs to our trac system (See * Improvements on jabber server for collaborating outside of the peer-to-peer mesh
    18 KB (2,908 words) - 03:37, 6 August 2013
  • Articles for Review : assign articles to one of several metaprocesses: * Peer review (neutrality, length, &c)
    7 KB (1,148 words) - 10:31, 4 April 2008
  • | MIT Technology Review – [http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/20711/ $100 Laptop Program's N | Taiwan Review - [http://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xitem=30736&ctnode=1337&mp=1 Small
    49 KB (6,846 words) - 11:33, 23 February 2012
  • | align="center" | MIT: Technology Review ...d para la Laptop de USD 100]]<span style="font-size:60%; "><br/>Technology Review: Security Model Released for the $100 Laptop</span>
    34 KB (4,948 words) - 21:50, 3 May 2008
  • ...econdly, preserving the original text in the translation may simplify peer review and help with maintenance. ...n category]] thus allowing other translators to find them and collaborate, review, make comments, etc. on them.
    48 KB (7,312 words) - 22:23, 22 May 2011
  • ...t: one good way to get someone else to review your proposal is to offer to review theirs in exchange). Refer to (and cite) sources from educational theory an
    4 KB (558 words) - 17:23, 13 May 2008
  • ...ess conference with Negroponte, Annan breaks the handle. Time for a design review." ...es pop out of the box, they will make a mesh network of their own, peer-to-peer. This is something initially developed at MIT and the Media Lab. We are als
    35 KB (5,389 words) - 12:22, 1 June 2012
  • ...j Ghimire of Bishwamitra assisting his colleague Kapil Gautam. The Peer-to-peer interaction has been amazing. ...d topics and gave some brief training and then left ample time for Peer-to-Peer interaction where the more advanced teachers trained others. Once a few tea
    97 KB (16,717 words) - 14:08, 9 November 2010
  • * Fast Review of the 6 (was 5) latest (greatest!) HW/Project Proposals: ...got some UK people together for the meeting, but if you want more time to review, that'of course that's fine
    30 KB (4,658 words) - 21:23, 2 July 2009
  • ...t presents four empirical studies of K–12 1:1 computing programs and one review of key themes in the conversation about 1:1 computing among advocates and c ...over the 15 months of the study, olpc kids are about six months ahead of peer group without OLPC XO's
    21 KB (2,908 words) - 06:24, 27 July 2016
  • ...ess conference with Negroponte, Annan breaks the handle. Time for a design review." ...es pop out of the box, they will make a mesh network of their own, peer-to-peer. This is something initially developed at MIT and the Media Lab. We are als
    35 KB (5,685 words) - 12:23, 1 June 2012
  • ...d to function well in any environment, they work better if a resource-rich peer (the school server) is available, providing a library, centralized network ...d accounting procedures and systems in accordance with US GAAP;<br/>• Review and implementation of financial systems controls that will complement the i
    19 KB (2,742 words) - 21:04, 31 July 2008
  • ...C doesn't have a formal mechanism for setting up smaller trials, immediate peer feedback on school pilot projects is often available in our Live Chat (IRC) ...ps.google.com/group/unleashkids Unleash Kids mailing list] if you can help review or co-mentor others' independent projects & sustainable grassroots planning
    7 KB (1,105 words) - 19:16, 3 November 2015
  • type out wishlists as fast as possible, and then review? * shenki has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
    23 KB (3,807 words) - 02:01, 13 November 2008
  • ...sentation to the class. This introduces new vocabulary, spellchecking, and peer support. ...collaboration with a "buddy". Teachers can also use the content for yearly review and reports to parents.''
    2 KB (382 words) - 13:24, 28 March 2013
  • by peer)) _sj_> marcopg, actually : coordinating bug review (8.2.1 and 0.84)
    53 KB (8,592 words) - 12:05, 19 December 2012
  • ...y. A compelling proposal should outline your project's full life-cycle, so peer reviewers understand its detailed potential & possibilities. Strongly Encou Projects undergo [[Contributors program/meetings|Community Review]] at an online meeting, which you are invited to attend. If approved by a [
    16 KB (2,362 words) - 18:52, 14 December 2013
  • tech in place to provide peer support and to help encourage and their classroom needs and their tech and on the ground and peer
    106 KB (15,367 words) - 20:35, 29 January 2009
  • <_sj_> for one : public review process <hullaw> _sj_: Like a review board?
    18 KB (3,004 words) - 16:24, 20 February 2009

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)