User talk:CScott: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:54, 29 September 2008

Template:Latest Releases/flavors

Saw you commented out the 'inclusion' of the "stable release" links in the /flavors... would a single link to

http://olpc.download.redhat.com/olpc/streams/development/LATEST-STABLE-BUILD/

be a better alternative? Or comment out the use of the line in the template itself... --Xavi 17:25, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

I commented it out, so {{Latest Releases}} will not show it... when we get back flavors, just let me know or uncomment them :) --Xavi 23:29, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

OLPC Project suggestions

Per your request for wiki-fication of your project grab-bag, please see Projects_and_proposals. Cjl 14:28, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

What_release_am_I_running%3F

Could you please categorize your pages when you make them? Even if you make up a new category it's better than no category at all. It helps from pages getting orphaned like you often complain about. Seth 00:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Experiments with unordered paths

Hey, you wrote a pretty good page. It's really interesting to think about and I really like the idea of remixible tags vs folders order. It would be even better if your page were categorized, maybe Developers philosophy journal sugar or *something* at least. It would also be better if this page were described somewhere else and then linked to? Search really isn't reliable for things like this. Seth 00:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. I hope to move the content to "Journal2" or some such at some point, since the page isn't really about "unordered paths" any more. I'm dumping content there right now, and when I've got something interesting to show for "Journal2" (RSN) I'll rewrite & rename it. Thanks! CScott 03:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:36, 29 September 2008 (view source) Sethwoodworth (talk \| contribs) (→‎Experiments with unordered paths: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:54, 29 September 2008 (view source) CScott (talk \| contribs) (→‎Experiments with unordered paths) Newer edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Hey, you wrote a pretty good [[Experiments with unordered paths\|page]]. It's really interesting to think about and I really like the idea of remixible tags vs folders order. It would be even better if your page were categorized, maybe Developers philosophy journal sugar or something at least. It would also be better if this page were described somewhere else and then linked to? Search really isn't reliable for things like this. [[User:Sethwoodworth\|Seth]] 00:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)		Hey, you wrote a pretty good [[Experiments with unordered paths\|page]]. It's really interesting to think about and I really like the idea of remixible tags vs folders order. It would be even better if your page were categorized, maybe Developers philosophy journal sugar or something at least. It would also be better if this page were described somewhere else and then linked to? Search really isn't reliable for things like this. [[User:Sethwoodworth\|Seth]] 00:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

			: Agreed. I hope to move the content to "Journal2" or some such at some point, since the page isn't really about "unordered paths" any more. I'm dumping content there right now, and when I've got something interesting to show for "Journal2" (RSN) I'll rewrite & rename it. Thanks! [[User:CScott\|CScott]] 03:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)