OLPC:Administrators: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (one more move)
 
(94 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. Some notes
This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. If you are looking for information on being an administrator, or on admin rights and responsibilities, see
[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents#For_moderators for administrators]. ''You can see a list of admins at [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Special:Listusers?group=sysop Special:Listusers], and recent rights changes at [[special:log]].''
'''[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents#For_moderators notes for administrators]''' and the '''[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Administrators administrator's manual]'''.


* For a list of admins, see [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Special:Listusers?group=sysop Special:Listusers]
⚫
For older requests, see the '''[[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive]]'''.
* For a list of recent rights changes, see [[special:log]]
⚫
* For older requests, see the '''[[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive]]'''.


== Nominations for adminship ==
== Nominations for adminship ==
Adminship should be no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the [[special:log|logs]], the delete and protect tabs, and the [[special:blockip|block tool]]; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.
Adminship is no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the [[special:log|logs]], the delete and protect tabs, and the [[special:blockip|block tool]]; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.


'''All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.'''
'''All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.'''


To nominate a user, please add a section with their name, and a {{User|username}} template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they should make a good admin. '''List newest nominations at the top of the page'''. After ten days, any bureaucrat can close the nomination; people with unanimous support are likely to be adminned. Any nominee with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.
To nominate a user, add a section here with their name, and a {{User|username}} template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they would be a reasonable admin. '''List newest nominations at the top of the page'''. After ten days, nominations should be closed, and any admin can do the closing; nominations with more than 80% support are likely to be adminned. Nominees with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.<small><sup>[[OLPC talk:Administrators|see talk]]</sup></small>


* none
=== [[user:CScott|CScott]] ===
Nom for bureaucratship. Because scott likes to be given random urgent tasks, and knows how to dance with a mop. --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 07:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


=== others to consider ===
* anti-vandalism '''support''' --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 07:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
* [[User:mollydb|mollydb]], [[user:barb0101|barb0101]], [[user:davewa|davewa]]


== Nominations for deadminship ==
== Nominations for de-adminship ==
''we have a lot of accounts that are inactive, and quite a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, in fact. We should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.''
''We have a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, and should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.''


Admins who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year may have their flag removed. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. Easy enough to get it back if desired later; this way the list of admins and bureaucrats is reasonably accurate.
These accounts should get a review by a bureaucrat, I'm not necessarily nominating them for de-adminning, just noticed these when looking through user rights log. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 15:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
: They've never used their powers, or only used them for one day; and don't have personal emails set. We can deadmin them temporarily; I trust all of them, and all are welcome to reapply here for adminship. I think we should mandate that admin candidates set a valid email address so they can be reached. --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 19:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

* [a] {{user|Danny}} no user page, still sysop (b removed)
*: asked on userpage about this, has history and talkpage --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]]

* [a] {{user|Cavallo}}, {{user|Papert}}, {{user|ZdenekBroz}}
*: users who have never used their admin flags, and are unlikely to do so in the near future. all can reapply or be renommed.

'''comments'''
* There should be some general principle that admins/bureaucrats who are inactive for 1 yr / 6 mo should be put up for a quick flag vote. gaining/losing a flag should be no big deal, but the list of people with the flag should be a fair representation of people interested in listening to requests that need a trustworthy (and available) janitor's response. --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]]


== Recently discussed ==
== Recently discussed ==


Older archives : [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive 1]] | [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive2|archive 2]]
=== [[User:skierpage|skierpage]] ===
⚫
{{user|skierpage}}

Nom for adminship for his help with and expertise in the maintenance of [[Semantic MediaWiki]].
: {{done}} --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 08:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

* '''support''' as nom -- [[User:Mstone|Michael Stone]] 21:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' -- skierpage has done great work. [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 22:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' -- getting s.page sysop isn't just important it's mandatory [[User:Sethwoodworth|Seth]] 23:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 03:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' -- SP kicks butt. [[User:Holt]] 12 September 2008


=== [[user:AuntiMame|AuntiMame]] ===
⚫
{{user|AuntiMame}}

Could use help with a little mop-and-bucketing around the site. --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 06:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
: {{done}} --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 08:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

* '''support''' as nominator -- --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 06:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' -- [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 22:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' -- Diane is excellent and can more than be trusted with sysop [[User:Sethwoodworth|Seth]] 00:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' -- AuntiMame's a true Godsend -- don't overwork her plz. [[User:Holt]] 12 September 2008

=== [[user:femslade|femslade]] ===
⚫
{{user|femslade}}

Self-nom: I would like admin to facilitate my work in cleaning up and organizing the wiki particularly semantic templates and pages.
: <looks around>
:: {{done}} ''was done some time ago, out of policy, but out of supposed necessity
* '''support''' --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 19:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


== Older Questions and Answers ==
== Older Questions and Answers ==
Line 80: Line 42:
*: Take a look at [[OLPC:Vandalism]] and monitor [[Special:Recentchanges]] using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit [[Special:Contributions/newbies]] to see contribs by the newest users.
*: Take a look at [[OLPC:Vandalism]] and monitor [[Special:Recentchanges]] using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit [[Special:Contributions/newbies]] to see contribs by the newest users.


== Current bureaucrats ==
== List of current Admins ==
''see also: [[Special:Listusers]]''
''see also: [[Special:Listusers]]''
(The manual listings below are incomplete. Click the header links for a database listing.)

<span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bureaucrat&creationSort=1&limit=250 '''Bureaucrats''']</span>
* {{user|Cjb}}
* {{user|Cjb}}
* {{user|hhardy}}
* {{user|cjl}}
* {{user|Jg}}
* {{user|CScott}}
* {{user|Benjamin Mako Hill}}
* {{user|DanielDrake}}
⚫
* {{user|Edmcnierney}}
⚫
* {{user|LFaraone}}
⚫
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|Sj}} ‎
* {{user|Sj}} ‎
* {{user|Walter}}
* {{user|sridhar}}

⚫
* {{user|Wmb@firmworks.com}}


''inactive''
''inactive''
* {{user|Krstic}}
* {{user|Wmb@firmworks.com}}


=== <span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&limit=250 Administrators]</span> ===
== Current sysops ==


* {{user|cjl}}
* {{user|Bert}}
⚫
* {{user|CScott}}
* {{user|Femslade}}
* {{user|Femslade}}
* {{user|Firefoxman}}
* {{user|godiard}}
* {{user|Holt}}
* {{user|Holt}}
⚫
* {{user|homunq}}
* {{user|Ixo}}
* {{user|Ixo}}
* {{user|Kimquirk}}
* {{user|jvonau}}
* {{user|Leejc}}
* {{user|Leejc}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|Mcfletch}}
* {{user|MitchellNCharity}}
* {{user|MitchellNCharity}}
* {{user|Morgs}}
* {{user|Mstone}}
* {{user|Mstone}}
* {{user|nlee}}
* {{user|nlee}}
* {{user|Sethwoodworth}}
* {{user|Sethwoodworth}}
* {{user|Xavi}}
* {{user|rafaelOrtiz}}
* {{user|rafaelOrtiz}}
* {{user|Wad}}
* {{user|Wad}}
⚫
* {{user|Walter}}


''inactive''
''inactive''
* {{user|Aburton}}
* {{user|Benjamin Mako Hill}}
* {{user|Bernie}}
* {{user|Bernie}}
* {{user|Cavallo}}
* {{User|Chihyu}}
* {{User|Chihyu}}
* {{user|Danny}}
* {{user|hhardy}}
* {{user|Felice}}
* {{user|Jg}}
* {{user|Jacobolus}}
* {{user|Katie}}
* {{user|Katie}}
* {{user|Khassounah}}
* {{user|Kimquirk}}
* {{user|mlj}}
* {{user|Morgs}}
* {{user|Papert}}
* {{user|Xavi}}

* {{user|ZdenekBroz}}
<span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bot&creationSort=1&limit=250 '''Bots''']</span>

Latest revision as of 16:18, 14 May 2016

This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. If you are looking for information on being an administrator, or on admin rights and responsibilities, see notes for administrators and the administrator's manual.

Nominations for adminship

Adminship is no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the logs, the delete and protect tabs, and the block tool; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.

All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.

To nominate a user, add a section here with their name, and a username (talk · contribs) template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they would be a reasonable admin. List newest nominations at the top of the page. After ten days, nominations should be closed, and any admin can do the closing; nominations with more than 80% support are likely to be adminned. Nominees with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.see talk

  • none

others to consider

Nominations for de-adminship

We have a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, and should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.

Admins who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year may have their flag removed. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. Easy enough to get it back if desired later; this way the list of admins and bureaucrats is reasonably accurate.

Recently discussed

Older archives : archive 1 | archive 2

Older Questions and Answers

On Administrative tasks

  • I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
    Yes, it helps.
  • I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
    Ahh, interesting point. We should do this.
  • I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
    No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
  • What should I be doing to patrol vandalism?
    Take a look at OLPC:Vandalism and monitor Special:Recentchanges using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit Special:Contributions/newbies to see contribs by the newest users.

List of current Admins

see also: Special:Listusers (The manual listings below are incomplete. Click the header links for a database listing.)

Bureaucrats


inactive

Administrators

inactive

Bots

Retrieved from "http://wiki.laptop.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=OLPC:Administrators&oldid=298812"