OLPC:Administrators: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(arch2)
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:


== Nominations for adminship ==
== Nominations for adminship ==
Adminship should be no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the [[special:log|logs]], the delete and protect tabs, and the [[special:blockip|block tool]]; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.
Adminship is no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the [[special:log|logs]], the delete and protect tabs, and the [[special:blockip|block tool]]; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.


'''All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.'''
'''All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.'''


To nominate a user, please add a section with their name, and a {{User|username}} template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they should make a good admin. '''List newest nominations at the top of the page'''. After ten days, any bureaucrat can close the nomination; people with unanimous support are likely to be adminned. Any nominee with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.
To nominate a user, add a section here with their name, and a {{User|username}} template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they would be a reasonable admin. '''List newest nominations at the top of the page'''. After ten days, nominations should be closed, and any admin can do the closing; nominations with more than 80% support are likely to be adminned. Nominees with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.<small><sup>[[OLPC talk:Administrators|see talk]]</sup></small>


* none
=== [[User:FGrose|FGrose]] ===


=== others to consider ===
{{user|FGrose}} has been active on the wiki for some time and has recently been doing some much needed wiki-patrolling and counter-vandalism work. If he accepts this nomination, I think his efforts on behalf of the wiki would benefit from having rollback and could be trusted to use delete/block appropriately to help maintain wiki order. [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 03:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
* [[User:mollydb|mollydb]], [[user:barb0101|barb0101]], [[user:davewa|davewa]]
:I will help incrementally, with admin tasks as well, if desired. ''--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 03:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)''


⚫
== Nominations for de-adminship ==
''' Comments'''
⚫
''We have a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, and should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.''
: '''Time-lapse yes''' - I agree with Cjl that FGrose has been a great contributor (recent edits look excellent, thanks for the countervandalism!) and can be trusted to wield admin privs responsibly based on his participation in non-wiki project areas as well. His edit history is not as deep as some of our other admins (aside from recent rollbacking, it seems to be centered around Rochester-area pages), so my vote turns to a yes one week after he accepts his nomination here, so that there's more of an opportunity to look at and explore other areas of the wiki to see what can be done with his eventual mop and bucket. [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 04:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
: I agree with Mel. You don't need to be an admin to rollback vandalism (look for the [http://sam.zoy.org/wikipedia/godmode-light.js godmode-light] javascript plugin for a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:JS '''user-added script'''] that will make this easier). But recent work has been good - keep it up! --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 01:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


⚫
Admins who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year may have their flag removed. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. Easy enough to get it back if desired later; this way the list of admins and bureaucrats is reasonably accurate.
⚫
== Nominations for deadminship ==
⚫
''we have a lot of accounts that are inactive, and quite a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, in fact. We should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.''

=== Inactive admins ===
⚫
Admins -- who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. (easy enough to get it back if desired later).

'''comments'''
* There should be some general principle that admins/bureaucrats who are inactive for 1 yr / 6 mo should be put up for a quick flag vote. gaining/losing a flag should be no big deal, but the list of people with the flag should be a fair representation of people interested in listening to requests that need a trustworthy (and available) janitor's response. --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]]
* '''support'''. Same with email lists - starting and closing one should be trivial, within say that same 1 y / 6 month window of tolerance [[User:Yamaplos|Yamaplos]] 18:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
* '''support''' and a +1 to Yama's idea of extending this to inactive mailing lists as well.


== Recently discussed ==
== Recently discussed ==


Older archives : [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive 1]] | [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive2|archive 2]]
Older archives : [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive 1]] | [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive2|archive 2]]

=== [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] ===
: ''result: {{done}} --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 09:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)''

I'm self-nominating because it would be nice to be able to delete pages. I've come across enough false starts that have fuller versions elsewhere. Most of the wiki-work I do does not need the tools, but if I come across stuff (blockable vandalism or deleteable patent nonsense) on the way I'd like to be able to do it. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 04:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

'''Comments'''
* '''support''' -- Long and positive history on wiki, a well-known nym and contributor. Can be expected to use sysop privs wisely. [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 05:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 00:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
*: Note: be careful when deleting! If it's not a [[OLPC:Deletion#Speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] candidate, please tag it with <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> and add it to [[OLPC:Deletion#Pages|Pages for deletion]].
* '''support''' [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

=== [[user:Bert|Bert]] ===
: ''result: {{done}} --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 09:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)''

Bert is one of the oldest contributors to the project and this wiki, and maintainer of our Etoys package. Bert has been around a long time, and knows some of the aspects of page protection that need to be maintained and fixed (say, for core activities) as well as the difference between good and bad edits.

'''Comments'''
* '''support''' as nom -- --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 00:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 06:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

=== [[user:cjl|cjl]] (b) ===
: ''result: {{done}} --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 09:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)''

Chris is good at listening to all sides of a situation and figuring out what is important, and has been part of the community for a long time. A good person to keep an eye on adminship and renames.

'''Comments'''
* '''support''' as nom - --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 00:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''accept''' SJ's nomination. [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 06:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 10:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' (nom nom nomination) [[User:Sethwoodworth|Seth]] 16:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''support''' [[User:Yamaplos|Yamaplos]] 18:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


=== [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] (b) ===
:''result: done.''

Self-nomination: I would like to be able to help with the administrator-creating queue as well as renames (such as RT#31710). I have been a wiki admin here for nearly 1.5 years, have a long history of edits and welcoming new wiki contributors, and have this page on my watchlist. [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

* '''support''' -- Mel certainly has the requisite skills, experience and temperment to serve the OLPC wiki community well in the b-crat role. In addition, we must face the fact that a good number of the current b-crats are either less active on the wiki (due to other demands on their time) or perhaps inactive all together. [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 22:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
* You mean she wasn't one already? '''support''' --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 15:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
* '''support''' [[User:Yamaplos|&lt;sub&gt;Yamaplos&lt;/sub&gt;]] 03:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC) (how do you do the cute effects in the sig, SJ?)
*: I'm guessing it would work with something other than '<nowiki><sub></nowiki>' - you can see from the wikitext that your markup is being automatically converted to html characters... --[[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]]
: Hi - just popping in here to note that it's been more than the 10 days after which [http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=bureaucrat any bureaucrat] could close the nomination, one way or the other. [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 05:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

*: {{done}} [[User:Cjl|cjl]] 22:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


== Older Questions and Answers ==
== Older Questions and Answers ==
Line 99: Line 42:
*: Take a look at [[OLPC:Vandalism]] and monitor [[Special:Recentchanges]] using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit [[Special:Contributions/newbies]] to see contribs by the newest users.
*: Take a look at [[OLPC:Vandalism]] and monitor [[Special:Recentchanges]] using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit [[Special:Contributions/newbies]] to see contribs by the newest users.


== Bureaucrats ==
== List of current Admins ==
''see also: [[Special:Listusers]]''
''see also: [[Special:Listusers]]''
(The manual listings below are incomplete. Click the header links for a database listing.)

<span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bureaucrat&creationSort=1&limit=250 '''Bureaucrats''']</span>
* {{user|Cjb}}
* {{user|Cjb}}
* {{user|cjl}}
* {{user|cjl}}
⚫
* {{user|CScott}}
⚫
* {{user|DanielDrake}}
* {{user|Edmcnierney}}
* {{user|Edmcnierney}}
* {{user|hhardy}}
* {{user|LFaraone}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|Sj}} ‎
* {{user|Sj}} ‎
* {{user|Walter}}
* {{user|sridhar}}



''inactive''
''inactive''
* {{user|Wmb@firmworks.com}}
* {{user|Wmb@firmworks.com}}


=== <span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&limit=250 Administrators]</span> ===
== Current sysops ==


* {{user|bert}}
* {{user|Bert}}
⚫
* {{user|cjl}}
⚫
* {{user|CScott}}
⚫
* {{user|Edmcnierney}}
* {{user|Femslade}}
* {{user|Femslade}}
* {{user|Firefoxman}}
* {{user|godiard}}
* {{user|Holt}}
* {{user|Holt}}
* {{user|homunq}}
* {{user|homunq}}
* {{user|Ixo}}
* {{user|Ixo}}
* {{user|Kimquirk}}
* {{user|jvonau}}
* {{user|Leejc}}
* {{user|Leejc}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|Mcfletch}}
* {{user|MitchellNCharity}}
* {{user|MitchellNCharity}}
* {{user|Morgs}}
* {{user|Mstone}}
* {{user|Mstone}}
* {{user|nlee}}
* {{user|nlee}}
* {{user|Sethwoodworth}}
* {{user|Sethwoodworth}}
* {{user|Xavi}}
* {{user|rafaelOrtiz}}
* {{user|rafaelOrtiz}}
* {{user|Wad}}
* {{user|Wad}}
⚫
* {{user|Walter}}


''inactive''
''inactive''
* {{user|Aburton}}
* {{user|Benjamin Mako Hill}}
* {{user|Benjamin Mako Hill}}
* {{user|Bernie}}
* {{user|Bernie}}
* {{user|Cavallo}}
* {{User|Chihyu}}
* {{User|Chihyu}}
* {{user|Jacobolus}}
* {{user|hhardy}}
* {{user|Jg}}
* {{user|Jg}}
* {{user|Katie}}
* {{user|Katie}}
* {{user|Khassounah}}
* {{user|Kimquirk}}
* {{user|Krstic}}
* {{user|Morgs}}
* {{user|mlj}}
* {{user|Xavi}}

<span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bot&creationSort=1&limit=250 '''Bots''']</span>

Latest revision as of 16:18, 14 May 2016

This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. If you are looking for information on being an administrator, or on admin rights and responsibilities, see notes for administrators and the administrator's manual.

Nominations for adminship

Adminship is no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the logs, the delete and protect tabs, and the block tool; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.

All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.

To nominate a user, add a section here with their name, and a username (talk · contribs) template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they would be a reasonable admin. List newest nominations at the top of the page. After ten days, nominations should be closed, and any admin can do the closing; nominations with more than 80% support are likely to be adminned. Nominees with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.see talk

  • none

others to consider

Nominations for de-adminship

We have a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, and should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.

Admins who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year may have their flag removed. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. Easy enough to get it back if desired later; this way the list of admins and bureaucrats is reasonably accurate.

Recently discussed

Older archives : archive 1 | archive 2

Older Questions and Answers

On Administrative tasks

  • I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
    Yes, it helps.
  • I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
    Ahh, interesting point. We should do this.
  • I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
    No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
  • What should I be doing to patrol vandalism?
    Take a look at OLPC:Vandalism and monitor Special:Recentchanges using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit Special:Contributions/newbies to see contribs by the newest users.

List of current Admins

see also: Special:Listusers (The manual listings below are incomplete. Click the header links for a database listing.)

Bureaucrats


inactive

Administrators

inactive

Bots

Retrieved from "http://wiki.laptop.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=OLPC:Administrators&oldid=298812"