OLPC:Administrators: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(..)
 
(215 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. Some notes
This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. If you are looking for information on being an administrator, or on admin rights and responsibilities, see
[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents#For_system_administrators for administrators]. ''You can see a list of admins at [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Special:Listusers?group=sysop Special:Listusers].''
'''[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents#For_moderators notes for administrators]''' and the '''[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Administrators administrator's manual]'''.


* For a list of admins, see [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Special:Listusers?group=sysop Special:Listusers]
== Requests for adminship ==
* For a list of recent rights changes, see [[special:log]]
=== [[User:Firefoxman|Firefoxman]] ===
* For older requests, see the '''[[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive]]'''.
Working with Michael Connet. He requested adminship by mail.


== Nominations for adminship ==
==== Comments ====
Adminship is no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the [[special:log|logs]], the delete and protect tabs, and the [[special:blockip|block tool]]; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.
* '''Neutral''': I'd like to see a bit more non-admin cleanup first... [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 19:06, 8 December 2007 (EST)


'''All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.'''
=== [[User:Mcfletch|Mcfletch]] ===
Working with communities online. Helpful on the wiki; might make a fine admin. [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 21:32, 17 December 2007 (EST)


To nominate a user, add a section here with their name, and a {{User|username}} template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they would be a reasonable admin. '''List newest nominations at the top of the page'''. After ten days, nominations should be closed, and any admin can do the closing; nominations with more than 80% support are likely to be adminned. Nominees with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.<small><sup>[[OLPC talk:Administrators|see talk]]</sup></small>
==== comments ====
* '''Support''' as nominator. [[User:Sj|Sj]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 21:32, 17 December 2007 (EST)


* none
== Questions ==

=== others to consider ===
* [[User:mollydb|mollydb]], [[user:barb0101|barb0101]], [[user:davewa|davewa]]

== Nominations for de-adminship ==
''We have a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, and should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.''

Admins who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year may have their flag removed. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. Easy enough to get it back if desired later; this way the list of admins and bureaucrats is reasonably accurate.

== Recently discussed ==

Older archives : [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive|archive 1]] | [[OLPC:Administrators/Archive2|archive 2]]

== Older Questions and Answers ==

=== On Administrative tasks ===
* I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
* I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
*: Yes, it helps.
*: Yes, it helps.
Line 24: Line 38:
* I've been doing some reworks with the [[Ask OLPC a Question]] area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the [[... about XXX]] pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
* I've been doing some reworks with the [[Ask OLPC a Question]] area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the [[... about XXX]] pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
*: No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
*: No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
* FYI: People are still posting general questions on the [[Talk:The_OLPC_Wiki]] page, even though it is supposed to redirect to [[Talk:Main Page]] (which makes it something of a black hole for questions). Is it possible to disable editing on that discussion page (or merge the two)? &mdash;[[User:Leejc|Joe]] 11:51, 7 September 2007 (EDT)


* What should I be doing to patrol vandalism?
=== Where are our readers from? ===
*: Take a look at [[OLPC:Vandalism]] and monitor [[Special:Recentchanges]] using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit [[Special:Contributions/newbies]] to see contribs by the newest users.
Some time ago (technically last year ;) I raised the question about who's reading what - and more importantly (for me) from where. (See [[Talk:The_OLPC_Wiki#Visitor statistics|here]]).


== List of current Admins ==
My question originates in that knowing that kind of information we may be able either to tune content or promote/demote links in the front page, faq, etc. For example, if I knew that it was argies rarely visit Argentina's page, it could mean that they are looking for other kind of news, data, whatever; but at least I'd know they aren't reading it - maybe it's just lack of local diffusion.--[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 20:49, 20 January 2007 (EST)

== Current bureaucrats ==
''see also: [[Special:Listusers]]''
''see also: [[Special:Listusers]]''
(The manual listings below are incomplete. Click the header links for a database listing.)
* Cjb ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)

* Felice ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
<span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bureaucrat&creationSort=1&limit=250 '''Bureaucrats''']</span>
* Jg ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
* {{user|Cjb}}
* Krstic ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
* {{user|cjl}}
* Mako ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
* {{user|CScott}}
* Sj ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
* {{user|DanielDrake}}
* Walter ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
* {{user|Edmcnierney}}
* Wmb@firmworks.com ‎(Bureaucrat, Sysop)
* {{user|LFaraone}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|Sj}} ‎
* {{user|sridhar}}


''inactive''
* {{user|Wmb@firmworks.com}}

=== <span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&limit=250 Administrators]</span> ===

* {{user|Bert}}
* {{user|Femslade}}
* {{user|godiard}}
* {{user|Holt}}
* {{user|homunq}}
* {{user|Ixo}}
* {{user|jvonau}}
* {{user|Leejc}}
* {{user|mchua}}
* {{user|MitchellNCharity}}
* {{user|Mstone}}
* {{user|nlee}}
* {{user|Sethwoodworth}}
* {{user|rafaelOrtiz}}
* {{user|Wad}}
* {{user|Walter}}

''inactive''
* {{user|Benjamin Mako Hill}}
* {{user|Bernie}}
* {{User|Chihyu}}
* {{user|hhardy}}
* {{user|Jg}}
* {{user|Katie}}
* {{user|Kimquirk}}
* {{user|Morgs}}
* {{user|Xavi}}


<span class=plainlinks>[http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bot&creationSort=1&limit=250 '''Bots''']</span>
== Current sysops ==
* [[User:Khassounah|Khassounah]] ‎
* [[User:Papert|Papert]]
* [[User:Aburton|Aburton]]
* [[User:Cavallo|Cavallo]]
* [[User:Jacobolus|Jacobolus]] ‎
* [[User:mlj|Mlj]]
* [[User:Xavi|Xavi]] ‎
* [[User:rafaelOrtiz|Rafael Ortiz]]
* [[User:mchua|mchua]]

Latest revision as of 16:18, 14 May 2016

This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. If you are looking for information on being an administrator, or on admin rights and responsibilities, see notes for administrators and the administrator's manual.

Nominations for adminship

Adminship is no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the logs, the delete and protect tabs, and the block tool; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.

All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.

To nominate a user, add a section here with their name, and a username (talk · contribs) template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they would be a reasonable admin. List newest nominations at the top of the page. After ten days, nominations should be closed, and any admin can do the closing; nominations with more than 80% support are likely to be adminned. Nominees with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.see talk

  • none

others to consider

Nominations for de-adminship

We have a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, and should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.

Admins who haven't edited or used admin privs in over a year may have their flag removed. Anyone can argue to support/keep the flag for any of these folks; if there's no argument in favor it will be removed. Easy enough to get it back if desired later; this way the list of admins and bureaucrats is reasonably accurate.

Recently discussed

Older archives : archive 1 | archive 2

Older Questions and Answers

On Administrative tasks

  • I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
    Yes, it helps.
  • I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
    Ahh, interesting point. We should do this.
  • I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
    No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
  • What should I be doing to patrol vandalism?
    Take a look at OLPC:Vandalism and monitor Special:Recentchanges using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit Special:Contributions/newbies to see contribs by the newest users.

List of current Admins

see also: Special:Listusers (The manual listings below are incomplete. Click the header links for a database listing.)

Bureaucrats


inactive

Administrators

inactive

Bots