OLPC:Administrators

From OLPC
Revision as of 19:12, 30 January 2009 by Sj (talk | contribs) (+b)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the de facto place for admins to coordinate. If you are looking for information on being an administrator, or on admin rights and responsibilities, see notes for administrators and the administrator's manual.

Nominations for adminship

Adminship should be no big deal. Administrators need to learn how to use the logs, the delete and protect tabs, and the block tool; please nominate regular wiki users you trust, checking that they have some familiarity with the wiki.

All editors and wiki-users are encouraged to weigh on on nominees for adminship.

To nominate a user, please add a section with their name, and a username (talk · contribs) template below it, along with a paragraph describing their work and why they should make a good admin. List newest nominations at the top of the page. After ten days, any bureaucrat can close the nomination; people with unanimous support are likely to be adminned. Any nominee with unanimous support from more than three editors can be adminned after five days.

Mchua (b)

Self-nomination: I would like to be able to help with the administrator-creating queue as well as renames (such as RT#31710). I have been a wiki admin here for nearly 1.5 years, have a long history of edits and welcoming new wiki contributors, and have this page on my watchlist. Mchua 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

  • support -- Mel certainly has the requisite skills, experience and temperment to serve the OLPC wiki community well in the b-crat role. In addition, we must face the fact that a good number of the current b-crats are either less active on the wiki (due to other demands on their time) or perhaps inactive all together. cjl 22:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • You mean she wasn't one already? support --Sj talk 15:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


Homunq

I'm self-nominating because it would be nice to be able to delete pages. I've come across enough false starts that have fuller versions elsewhere. Most of the wiki-work I do does not need the tools, but if I come across stuff (blockable vandalism or deleteable patent nonsense) on the way I'd like to be able to do it. Homunq 04:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • support -- Long and positive history on wiki, a well-known nym and contributor. Can be expected to use sysop privs wisely. cjl 05:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
  • support --Sj talk 00:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    Note: be careful when deleting! If it's not a speedy deletion candidate, please tag it with {{delete}} and add it to Pages for deletion.
  • support Mchua 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Bert

Bert is one of the oldest contributors to the project and this wiki, and maintainer of our Etoys package. Bert has been around a long time, and knows some of the aspects of page protection that need to be maintained and fixed (say, for core activities) as well as the difference between good and bad edits.

Comments

  • support as nom -- --Sj talk 00:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • support cjl 06:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • support Mchua 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

cjl (b)

Chris is good at listening to all sides of a situation and figuring out what is important, and has been part of the community for a long time. A good person to keep an eye on adminship and renames.

Comments

  • support as nom - --Sj talk 00:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • accept SJ's nomination. cjl 06:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • support Mchua 10:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • support (nom nom nomination) Seth 16:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • support Yamaplos 18:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Rollbacker

For anti-vandalism purposes, there is a mass rollback-all by-user feature to mediawiki: Special:Listusers/rollbacker If you want to help fight wiki-vandalism apply to receive the rollbacker permission and fight wiki spam!

But is it in use? --Sj talk

For proper use of the tool, see the wikipedia help article: [1]

Seth

I'm applying myself as I do not yet have this permission, even though I already have other permissions. Generally it should be much easier to get rollbacker permissions than admin. It doesn't require as much community support. Seth 16:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

No-big-deal-support. --Sj talk 06:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Mel

I agree with Seth that it should be much easier to get rollbacker permissions than admin, and would also like to apply for rollbacker privs. I am a current sysop but focus primarily on technical wiki content creation; the easier it is for me to fight spam, the more likely I am to do it. Mchua 15:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

support --Sj talk

Nominations for deadminship

we have a lot of accounts that are inactive, and quite a small number of active admins and bureaucrats, in fact. We should clean up our lists to reflect this fact.


comments

  • There should be some general principle that admins/bureaucrats who are inactive for 1 yr / 6 mo should be put up for a quick flag vote. gaining/losing a flag should be no big deal, but the list of people with the flag should be a fair representation of people interested in listening to requests that need a trustworthy (and available) janitor's response. --Sj talk
  • support. Same with email lists - starting and closing one should be trivial, within say that same 1 y / 6 month window of tolerance Yamaplos 18:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Recently discussed

gregorio

Greg has been a dedicated and paranoid editor for over a year, and is now helping maintain activities for our releases. He could use adminship to protect and unprotect (and edit) such pages.

  • support ----Sj talk 06:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
    Done.

CScott (b)

Nom for bureaucratship. Because scott likes to be given random urgent tasks, and knows how to dance with a mop. --Sj talk 07:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

  • anti-vandalism support --Sj talk 07:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
    Done. We need more bureaucrats so that I'm not the only one accepting such requests. --Sj talk

Danny, Papert, ZdenekBroz, Cavallo

  • [a] Danny (talk · contribs) no user page, still sysop (b removed)
    asked on userpage about this, has history and talkpage --Sj talk
    Removed. --Sj talk
  • [a] Cavallo (talk · contribs), Papert (talk · contribs), ZdenekBroz (talk · contribs)
    users who have never used their admin flags, and are unlikely to do so in the near future. all can reapply or be renommed.
    Removed the latter two. Cavallo is inactive but knows how to use the wiki, and may need to edit/move protected pages. --Sj talk


skierpage

skierpage (talk · contribs)

Nom for adminship for his help with and expertise in the maintenance of Semantic MediaWiki.

Done. --Sj talk 08:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support as nom -- Michael Stone 21:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support -- skierpage has done great work. cjl 22:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support -- getting s.page sysop isn't just important it's mandatory Seth 23:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support --Sj talk 03:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support -- SP kicks butt. User:Holt 12 September 2008


AuntiMame

AuntiMame (talk · contribs)

Could use help with a little mop-and-bucketing around the site. --Sj talk 06:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. --Sj talk 08:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support as nominator -- --Sj talk 06:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support -- cjl 22:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support -- Diane is excellent and can more than be trusted with sysop Seth 00:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
  • support -- AuntiMame's a true Godsend -- don't overwork her plz. User:Holt 12 September 2008

femslade

femslade (talk · contribs)

Self-nom: I would like admin to facilitate my work in cleaning up and organizing the wiki particularly semantic templates and pages.

<looks around>
Done. was done some time ago, out of policy, but out of supposed necessity
  • support --Sj talk 19:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Older Questions and Answers

On Administrative tasks

  • I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
    Yes, it helps.
  • I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
    Ahh, interesting point. We should do this.
  • I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
    No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
  • What should I be doing to patrol vandalism?
    Take a look at OLPC:Vandalism and monitor Special:Recentchanges using some of the features there : toggle viewing "logged in users", for instance, and you will only see the IPs who have never logged in. You can also visit Special:Contributions/newbies to see contribs by the newest users.

Bureaucrats

see also: Special:Listusers

inactive

Current sysops

inactive

Retrieved from "http://wiki.laptop.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=OLPC:Administrators&oldid=193799"